Stephen King's latest novel continues his long tradition of using events from his own life to inform the lives of his extremely well-crafted and believable characters. Revival is the story of fanaticism and addiction and magic (or science? Magical science? Scientific magic?). The main character is Jamie, who first meets Rev. Jacobs when he is a young boy living in a small town with his parents and siblings. Rev. Jacobs and his young wife take over the struggling church in town, and turn it into a thriving congregation, complete with an active youth ministry. All of the young people in town love Rev. Jacobs and his beautiful, talented wife, and they are taken in by his adorable little boy. When tragedy strikes the Jacobs family, Rev. Jacobs preaches a sermon that gets him driven out of town.
Years later, Jamie is a strung-out rock guitarist who is one high away from being incarcerated or dead. When he stumbles upon the Rev. Jacobs at a carnival, he can barely believe what he's seeing. The former minister has taken his lifelong fascination with electricity and devised some truly amazing optical illusions. But that's not all Charles Jacobs has discovered. The man formerly known as Rev. Jacobs thinks he can help Jamie with his little addiction problem, but the help will come at a price that Jamie isn't sure he's willing to pay.
King himself famously dealt with an addiction to pain killers after a near-fatal car accident left him in near constant pain for years as he recovered. Jamie's drug addiction certainly mirrors his experience to a certain extent, but it is Rev. Jacob's addiction that is the truly frightening part of this story. While this story is not horror in the traditional sense, there is that element of the supernatural that infuses almost all of King's works in some way. This time the "magic" is presented in the guise of science that we don't yet understand, and highlights the dangers of playing around with natural forces without really understanding the possible consequences.
The story also explores the nature of faith, both in the opening section when Jamie is a child, and later in the book when the Rev. Jacobs becomes a faith healer. The power that Jacobs had was terrifying, but couched in the language and ritual of religion people were more than willing to be taken in. People who are desperately searching for an end to their fear, pain, and despair become easy marks for a con man. But was it a con? If people really were healed, did it matter where the power came from? When Jamie discovered that the people who were healed didn't always stay that way, he became determined to stop Jacobs. Determined, that is, until it was his own high school sweetheart who needed help. As usual, King shines a light on human nature in all of its flawed beauty.
There is no lack of books about the effects of slavery in the antebellum South, and its lingering effects during the Jim Crow era, pre-Civil Rights Movement. And I've read a lot of them. So I will admit that when my book club chose this book as its March pick, I was sort of "meh" about the whole thing. The one thing that made me slightly more enthusiastic was the author. I'd read The Secret Life of Bees and The Mermaid's Chair, and I really enjoyed Kidd's style, and the way that she wrote her characters with such care and gentleness, even when they themselves are not caring or gentle, per se.
I should really stop questioning my book club's decisions (with one notable exception-I'm looking at you On Strike for Christmas!), because I got completely sucked into The Invention of Wings. Told from the alternating perspectives of a young plantation owner's daughter and the slave that she is "gifted" on her eleventh birthday, the book explores various types of oppression-based on race, class, gender, and religion-and their effect on both the oppressors and the oppressed. Sarah Grimke, the daughter of a plantation-owning member of South Carolina's elite, is horrified to be given her own slave for her birthday, and in her naivete tries to free the young woman that has been given to her as her maid. Sarah is sure that her father, who has allowed her access to his books and has encouraged her to speak her mind about issues in a way usually reserved for boys, will accede to her wishes and allow the young woman her freedom. When that doesn't happen, she tries to assuage her own guilt by treating Hetty, her slave, more as a friend than a servant, teaching her to read and allowing her to speak her mind freely in her presence. Hetty, for her part, has no illusions about the true nature of her relationship with Sarah, and despite the fairly kind treatment Hetty gets from her, she carries out small acts of rebellion. When Sarah's secret lessons are discovered, the consequences are swift and severe, and lead Sarah to contemplate what if anything she can do to dismantle the evils of human bondage and free herself from the stifling expectations of a Southern lady. Hetty, of course, is not planning to wait on Sarah or any other white folks to free her. She is determined that she will free herself. As the story unfolds, and both girls grow into strong, independent women, their relationship changes as they both try to find their freedom.
Far from being a typical white savior narrative, this book shows a much more realistic and balanced picture of the relationship between Hetty and Sarah. Hetty is fierce and outspoken with Sarah about the differences between them, and has conflicted feelings of gratitude, anger, disappointment, and even love towards her. Sarah, for her part, realizes while agitating for fair treatment of slaves that she herself is suffering oppression, as a woman of a certain class, that keeps her from having the impact on the world that she wishes. As Sarah becomes more certain that she is meant to fight against the evils of slavery, she also finds that she must fight to be heard, even among other abolitionists. Ultimately, both women end up saving themselves.
I'm a pretty big fan of historical fiction. To be honest, I wish that history classes were taught using historical fiction as the hook. Read Ken Follett, then research the time period to confirm or deny his portrayal. (Of course, I think that literature can teach us just about anything).
For instance, if you were interested in art, say the process of making tapestries, in the 17th century, you could read Tracy Chevalier's The Lady and the Unicorn. Much as she did in The Girl with the Pearl Earring, Chevalier used a famous piece of art from the past and created an elaborate backstory using characters based on the real artists, artisans, nobles, petty bureaucrats, and common folk who contributed (either in reality or in the fictional world she creates) to the creation of that work of art. In The Lady and the Unicorn, we are introduced to an arrogant Parisian artist named Nicholas des Innocentes (who is anything but). This womanizer is commissioned by a newly noble patron to design a set of tapestries to be hung in his formal dining room. Nicholas agrees, though not before seducing the young daughter of his patron. When he insists on traveling to Brussels to oversee the work of turning his smallish paintings into large tapestries, we meet the weaver, Georges, and his family. Jumping back and forth between Paris and Brussels, we learn a lot about French society, the social expectations of men and women based on their gender and station, and about making tapestries in the pre-industrial age.
The best parts of the book for me was the descriptions of the tapestry making process. The process was incredibly painstaking, and could takes months or years to complete depending on the size of the tapestry and the complexity of the pattern. The plot itself has enough drama to make it an enjoyable read even if you don't care about the art-making parts, with lots of twists and turns. There is lust, love, betrayal-all of the components of a satisfying read. The story is old through alternating perspectives, which has become a very common narrative style, and Chevalier does a good job making the story feel cohesive despite the frequent change in narrator. As historical fiction goes, I suspect this book is longer on the fiction than the history, but either way it is an an enjoyable way to spend a few hours!
This fall I installed a Little Free Library in my front yard. For anyone who might not be familiar with Little Free Library, it is an organization that promotes and supports small "take one, give one" libraries in yard, parks, and other public places. To be honest, my reasons for wanting on were not entirely altruistic. I need somewhere for the "ink and paper" books I've read to go, and I can only give so many at a time to my public library. But, of course, the universe has other plans for me than neat, orderly, not-stuffed-to-the-gills bookshelves. It's that whole "give one" part of "take one, give one" that gets me. Because while its true that the books I read go to good home (rather than my overstuffed bookcases), they are replaced with other books! Clearly, my house is meant to be a permanent fire hazard.
There are, of course, upsides to this arrangement, like getting to know my neighbors as readers, and
watching the neighbor kids come running to see if there is anything new in the library for them. But the biggest, without doubt, is that books appear before me that I would never have found on my own. Such was the case with The Honey Thief, by Elizabeth Graver. It tells the story of eleven year old Eva, a city girl exiled to rural upstate New York after a brief crime spree as a shoplifter. In desperation, her mother Miriam gives up her job, finds a subletter for their tiny Manhattan apartment, and hightails it out to the country. Eva spends her days riding her bike down isolated roads, blacktop and dirt, while the babysitter her mother hired sleeps on the porch in the heat of the day. One day while riding, Eva comes upon a table full of honey, glowing in the sunlight. Her inner conflict (should she steal it or not) causes her to come back again and again to the small farm, where she gets to know the reclusive bee keeper, and where she learns about the importance of balance and harmony, in the life of the bees, and in the life of her family.
It can be a challenge for authors to write adult novels with child narrators, but Graver manages it pretty well. There are also chapters told from the point of view of the bee keeper, and of her mother, but it is Eva's chapters where the real emotional pay off is for the reader. I found myself rooting for Eva, even when she made choices that were not necessarily in anyone's best interest. Graver also manages the fact that Eva is a girl child and the bee keeper an adult man in a way that is neither creepy nor inappropriate (though there is one scene that verges on ewwww). All in all, I'd say The Honey Thief is a pretty good way to spend an afternoon.
I love spooky stories. Some of my very favorite authors write the best ones (I'm looking at you, King and Gaiman). I am also a skeptic. I read supposedly "real" accounts of ghosts and spirits and the like and I am completely unmoved. But a fictional ghost story gets me every time.
I also love mysteries, so I was pretty excited when my mother recommended Help for the Haunted by John Searle. A murder mystery of sorts, with all of the supernatural, paranormal creepiness I could want. The narrator of the story, Sylvie, is the daughter of a pair of "spirit hunters". They make their living giving talks at paranormal conventions, and helping people with hauntings. After getting a strange phone call one snowy night, Sylvie and her parents leave the warmth of home for a cold dark of an empty church at midnight. Before the night is over, both of her parents are dead, and Sylvie and her sister are left orphaned.
One year later, Sylvie is trying to deal with her grief over her parents' deaths, and to process her feelings about her own role in the events of that winter's evening. She feels as though there is something important she is not remembering about what happened in that church, and she desperately wants to remember before the man accused of killing her mother and father go on trial. Her sister, who is now her guardian, is no help, all anger and indifference and sarcasm. And, the spooky events that used to plague her family during her parents' work have started happening again-dolls that appear where they shouldn't, lights that appear to turn on and off by themselves. It's all too much, and Sylvie feels as though she will go crazy if she can't discover the truth.
I really enjoyed the mood of the whole book, up until the very end. There is just enough creepy goodness to make you a little uncomfortable (in a good way, if you like that sort of thing) while you are reading (probably with the lights on). But this is also a story about mothers and daughters, about faith vs. skepticism, and about trying to do right by people, even when you're not sure what "right" is. That said, I was disappointed in the ending. Without giving anything away, I can confidently say that most readers of this book will be completely blindsided by the answer to the riddle of what happened that night in the church, not because Searle expertly crafts such a tight narrative that the clues are only obvious in hindsight, but because the clues are not really there to begin with. While this isn't technically the right term for what I mean, the resolution to the story had a deus ex machina kind of feeling. Something comes right out of left field that no one could have seen coming, which annoyed me on a certain level because it made the end feel disjointed, like the ending to another story. Or maybe I was just not paying enough attention (but I don't think so). At any rate, I'd still recommend this book to anyone who likes a good scary story, or a good family story, or a good mystery story. It's a (mostly) satisfying read.
There are no shortage of World War II stories in the world. The Greatest Generation, fighting perhaps the last truly righteous war, came home from Europe and the Pacific and became our fathers,
grandfathers, uncles, and grumpy old neighbors. American pop culture has seen plenty of images of D-Day, the liberation of the concentration camps, and the naval battles of the Pacific. And we've begun, in small ways, to deal with our own shameful WWII history, when tens of thousands of American citizens, who happened to be Japanese, were rounded up and sent to internment camps.
But the story of Louis Zamperini, and the other men held as POWs in Japanese prisoner of war camps, is something new added to the long narrative of World War II and its aftermath. If Unbroken, by Laura Hillenbrand, was a fictional tale, I would probably say it is unrealistic. I mean, who would expect anyone to believe a story where survivors of a plane crash in the ocean survive for over 40 days drifting in a tiny raft in the Pacific, stalked by sharks, strafed by enemy aircraft, only to be "rescued" by the Japanese army and sent to prison camps, where the brutality shown them apparently knew no bounds? Any one of them is a former Olympic athlete? Yeah, right!
But this story is a true story, under the category of "you can't make this stuff up". Hillenbrand's book tell the chilling story of Louis Zamperini and his fellow pilots, flying bombing runs in the Pacific theater in planes that were themselves almost as dangerous to the lives of the crew as the enemy. To be honest, just the experiences of the men learning to fly these early war planes would have made a fascinating book. I was routinely horrified by the way the US military used these patriotic, enthusiastic young men (boys, really) as fodder for the war machine that sprang to life when Japan bombed Hawaii. But, of course, the real meat of the story is not about US military policy, but about the incredible struggle for survival that Louis and the other men who were stranded on that life raft endured in order to get back home.
What struck me most while reading this books was the lengths that the human mind will go to to preserve some shred of dignity in life. Despite the filth, the disease, the hunger, and the impossibly inhuman treatment suffered by the prisoners, each in their own way tried to find some small act of resistance or independence that made them feel as though they were still human, still valuable, still worthy of life and respect. Not every man was able to find a way to survive with sanity intact, but I think it is a great testament to the human spirit that even when being treated like animals, Louis and many of the men in the camps with him persevered. Of course, none of them left the experience without scars, both physical and mental.
Unless you live under a rock, you probably know that there is a movie of this book being released at Christmas. (I will admit to finding the timing unusual, since it is not exactly the most heartwarming, uplifting story.) I certainly plan to see it, but I am curious about one thing. The last quarter of the book examines the effects that Louis' experiences had on his psyche, his physical health, and his relationships. Will the movie? Are we so averse as a country to thinking/talking/considering the terrible consequences of making men into soldiers that the movie will end with a triumphant rescue, or will the film explore the deep, lingering pain that these men brought home? I certainly hope so. I hope that Hillenbrand would not have released the rights to the book without the part that, to me, speaks the most to what we can do as a society to make sure that no one, not one more American soldier or airman or seaman or marine, has to experience the brutalities of war the way the men in this book did.
Ah, the miracle of pregnancy and childbirth. That beautiful time when glowing women contentedly rub their ever-swelling bellies, whiling away the hours crafting beautiful hand-made works of art for their well-appointed nurseries. When the time comes for the special bundle to make its way into the world, they execute their meticulously planned labor plans, breathing away the pain without the use of drugs, pushing for all of two minutes before the baby appears, perfectly formed, into the hands of the doctor (or midwife or dula, if they are really going natural).
What? This doesn't sound like your birthing experience? Yeah, mine either, but as a culture we have mythologized pregnancy and childbirth to the point that women feel guilty if they haven't had the perfect Pinterest birthing experience (which, if you think about it, is good practice for once the child is actually born, and then they can feel guilty about the non-Pinterst perfect birthday parties and Elf on the Shelf ideas). The reality? Pregnancy and childbirth are wonderful, for most women. But even women with a completely normal pregnancy have to deal with swollen ankles, strange bodily fluids, sore and swollen breasts, constipation, back aches, and morning sickness. Child birth itself is miraculous, yes, but also messy, and, let's face it, pretty gross.
If you'd prefer to hold on to the description at the beginning of this post as your mental image of pregnancy and childbirth, then I suggest that you do NOT read The Midwife by Jennier Worth (also called Call the Midwife, depending on which edition you have). This memoir, upon which is based a PBS historical drama, is the first in a trilogy of books that examine the experiences of a group of midwives in post-war London. And it is not for the faint of heart.
London after World War II was battered. Many buildings had been destroyed by the Germans during the Blitz, and rebuilding plans were stalled due to budget cuts and changes in government leadership. This left many poor families crammed together in tenements that had been slated for destruction, until id became clear that there was no where near enough housing left for everyone in London. Jennifer Worth left her comfortable middle class home to join a corp of midwives working in London's East End, treating women who lived in unsanitary conditions most of us can only imagine, many of whom already had many children. That close to the docks, the men tended to be hard, and the women tended to be overwhelmed. This first book tells about Jennifer's early days as a midwife, and is full of fascinating and graphic descriptions of cases she worked on.
If you are not comfortable reading graphic, rather vivid descriptions of other women's lady parts, and the smells and fluids that might come out of them, then you probably want to avoid this book. Ditto if you can't handle stories about dead and dying babies, or mothers, or both. The reality for most poor pregnant women in post-war London was that they dealt with their pregnancy living in a two room apartment with their husband and two or five or eight other children, an apartment that had no running water, no bathroom, and was either sweltering or freezing depending on the season.
If you can handle the content, then you will find a book that is written with what strikes me as typical middle-class English reserve. The stories are straightforward, with Worth sharing just enough of her own reactions to the situations to keep it from sounding too clinical. It's an interesting look at the beginning of the National Health Service, founded to provide universal, no-cost health care to the people of the United Kingdom. It is also an examination of how doctors, who were predominately male, either valued or dismissed the experience and knowledge of the midwives, causing a few tense and adversarial moments for the midwives themselves. And despite the circumstances of many of their patients, I think that there are things that American health care could learn from the way they provided services to their patients. The mythologized version of pregnancy might be prettier, but the reality is so much more interesting!