data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a181a/a181a124f7cb9777545a7a6be9251eba9d7797ca" alt=""
Davidson knows well how to use descriptive language-perhaps too well. The entire first third of the book is a bit hard to get through-not because the story is bad, but because he describes, in great detail, the gruesome and violent acts perpetrated on the narrator's body, first by the fire itself and then by the seemingly barbaric but ultimately effective treatments he requires to heal. The whole novel has a gloomy air, which suits the rather dark story perfectly. Marianne believes herself to be a 14th century nun, who has lived for so many years because she must pay for sins she committed for and on the narrator's character. Over the course of the book, as their modern day relationship progresses, we are treated to flashbacks told by Marianne that explain how she knew the narrator in a previous life. Moral emptiness and redemption are ideas explored throughout the novel, both through the narrator's cynical views on his previous and future life (he has an especially elaborate and violent end at his own hand all planned out for himself) and through the contradiction that is Marianne's character. She actually creates ugliness, in the form of the grotesques that adorn both her workspace and churches all over the world, in order to undo the evil she feels she has done. Is she truly a 700 year old nun, or are the voices that she hears coming from the stone a function of mental illness? Ultimately, the reader is left to decide. Whether she is "saving" herself, or merely delusional, the impact she has on the narrator is profound, and he finds himself feeling more whole in his ruined body than he ever did when he was beautiful.
I read this book when it first came out, and I remember liking it. Now, after reading your post, I'm thinking I'll pick it up for a re-read. It definitely would be good book group material - lots to talk about.
ReplyDelete