I am a big fan of high fantasy. I got my first taste from the Narnia books, and was gifted the Shannara series as a middle schooler. Give me a series with elves and dwarves and trolls and chances are pretty good I will love it.
Not so sure I would have said the same about a fantasy series that revolves around necromancy, but that was before I discovered Sabriel, the first book in the Abhorsen series by Garth Nix. There are no elves or dwarves to be found, but there is a strong, female main character. Sabriel is the daughter of the Abhorsen, the good necromancer whose job it is to send the dead back into death, thereby undoing the work of the bad necromancers, who bring the dead back into life. When her father disappears, Sabriel is forced to leave the relative safety of her boarding school and venture into the Old Kingdom, where magic rules and technology is useless. She begins a quest to free her father and defeat an evil greater than she imagined.
One of the things I've loved about this series so far is the strong female leads. Sabriel portrays the titular young woman as someone who loves firecely, who thinks on her feet, who is more than willing to venture into the land of the dead to save people she loves. The setting is interesting-the Old Kingdom is full of magic, but it is bordered by a world that has what seemed to be mid-20th century-type technology. It gives the whole thing a bit of a steampunk vibe. I'm about a third of the way through the second book, and the strong female thing continues through that book as well. The mythology that underlies the action is different than other series I have read, which makes the story feel fresh. An added benefit is that I've been listening to it on audiobook, and Tim Robbins is the narrator. I discovered this series on a list of young adult books, but I really think that adult readers of fantasy novels will also enjoy it.
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
My Favorite New Fantasy Series
Friday, August 19, 2016
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
There is no shortage of novels set in World War I or World War II. Those two conflicts, along with the Viet Nam War, defined most of the 20th century. The collapse of colonialism, the Cold War, the rise of America as a world power; so many things can be traced back to the wars and their aftermath. You'd think that over time those books would all start to blur together; that there wouldn't be anything new or different that could be said on the matter. And sometimes it does seem like the same story told over and over again in an endless stream of arrogant generals, miserable soldiers, and grieving mothers and widows. But sometimes an author takes a new approach to the subject that takes the reader to a part of the well-traveled path that is less well known.
Anna Hope manages this feat with her book, Wake. The story takes place three years after the end of
World War I. It follows three different women, all of whom lost something in the war. Ada, the grieving mother; Evelyn, the woman who's lover never returned; and Hettie, a young girl whose brother has come home from war physically unharmed, but emotionally wrecked. The stories of these women are connected by their experiences of war, and through the lens of the return to England of the Unknown Warrior (what we in America would call the Unknown Soldier). The perspective shifts from woman to women in the narration of the story, interspersed with the journey of the Unknown Warrior from a grave in the French countryside to a special resting place at Westminster Abbey.
The title seems to have two meanings. The most literal is that the entire country of Great Britain is having a wake for the Unknown Warrior as he finally returns home from war. This one soldier comes to symbolize all of those lost on fields of France and Belgium, and each person who watches the body in its ornate coffin travel by ship, train, and finally carriage to it's final resting place assign him meaning based on the people they lost in the war. But I think that the title also represents the awakening that the women in the novel have as they learn to accept and move past the grief and depression that four years of war and its aftermath wrought. These women learn to let go, each in their own way, of whatever is holding them back from moving forward with life. Ada must learn to let go of the fantasy that her son is really alive, and find a way to reconnect with her husband. Evelyn must find a way to let go of her hopes for the future with her beloved Fraser, and take the first steps towards finding new love. Hettie, who works in a dance hall to help her family survive financially, wants nothing more than to move away from her mother's oppressive beliefs and find her first love. More than anything she searched for freedom and joy in a world where most of the men of her generation have returned from war damaged emotionally and physically.
The men in the novel represent various classes of soldiers, officers and enlisted men alike, and there are some fairly dark descriptions of the horrors they witnessed. Each has come home, but none of them are able to just pick up their old life. Hope does a good job with her portrayal of how youthful enthusiasm and patriotic action was twisted and mangled into fear, cynicism, resentment, and hopelessness. As the Unknown Warrior reaches his final resting place, so too does the book reach its end, and like the citizens of the UK, the reader is left feeling ready to move on to a future that is brighter than the tragic past.

World War I. It follows three different women, all of whom lost something in the war. Ada, the grieving mother; Evelyn, the woman who's lover never returned; and Hettie, a young girl whose brother has come home from war physically unharmed, but emotionally wrecked. The stories of these women are connected by their experiences of war, and through the lens of the return to England of the Unknown Warrior (what we in America would call the Unknown Soldier). The perspective shifts from woman to women in the narration of the story, interspersed with the journey of the Unknown Warrior from a grave in the French countryside to a special resting place at Westminster Abbey.
The title seems to have two meanings. The most literal is that the entire country of Great Britain is having a wake for the Unknown Warrior as he finally returns home from war. This one soldier comes to symbolize all of those lost on fields of France and Belgium, and each person who watches the body in its ornate coffin travel by ship, train, and finally carriage to it's final resting place assign him meaning based on the people they lost in the war. But I think that the title also represents the awakening that the women in the novel have as they learn to accept and move past the grief and depression that four years of war and its aftermath wrought. These women learn to let go, each in their own way, of whatever is holding them back from moving forward with life. Ada must learn to let go of the fantasy that her son is really alive, and find a way to reconnect with her husband. Evelyn must find a way to let go of her hopes for the future with her beloved Fraser, and take the first steps towards finding new love. Hettie, who works in a dance hall to help her family survive financially, wants nothing more than to move away from her mother's oppressive beliefs and find her first love. More than anything she searched for freedom and joy in a world where most of the men of her generation have returned from war damaged emotionally and physically.
The men in the novel represent various classes of soldiers, officers and enlisted men alike, and there are some fairly dark descriptions of the horrors they witnessed. Each has come home, but none of them are able to just pick up their old life. Hope does a good job with her portrayal of how youthful enthusiasm and patriotic action was twisted and mangled into fear, cynicism, resentment, and hopelessness. As the Unknown Warrior reaches his final resting place, so too does the book reach its end, and like the citizens of the UK, the reader is left feeling ready to move on to a future that is brighter than the tragic past.
Thursday, October 08, 2015
Coco Chanel once famously said, "Once you've dressed, and before you leave the house, look in the mirror and take at least one thing off". While she was talking about fashion, I think there is some relevance in that quote for writing as well. While good fiction can be mutli-layered and complex, adding more characters, more plot lines, more words just for the sake of them can take a decent story and put it over the top.
I think that Kristin Hannah should have taken that advice when writing The Magic Hour. It is the
story of a psychiatrist named Julia who must flee her practice in disgrace after a scandal involving a patient of hers who perpetrated a violent act at school. When her sister, the sheriff in the small town where they grew up, calls her to consult on a case, she sees both an escape hatch and a chance to earn some redemption. A little girl has shown up in the town-battered, bruised, malnourished, non-verbal, and animalistic. The sheriff wants Julia to assess the girl, and get her to tell them who she is. As Julia begins to work with the girl, she realizes that she has stumbled upon a feral child-a child who has essentially been raised without any normal human socialization. As Julia becomes closer to the girl, she is determined to protect her from any and all outside influences that might want to exploit her.
This is the first Hannah book I've read, and I will admit that the kind of women's fiction she writes (a la Lifetime movie) is not really my jam. But I was intrigued enough with the premise that I think I would have been OK with the book if only she had followed dear old Coco's advice. There is a LOT going on in this book. There's the scandal that sends Julia away from her lucrative Los Angeles practice; the feral girl; a love story between Julia and one of the doctors in town, who in turn has his own secret that he is protecting; a love story between the sheriff and one of her deputies; a rocky relationship between the two sisters that must be resolved; a group of psychiatrists who want to study the girl like a specimen in a jar; and finally, the girl's father. The girl's father and his back story was the last straw. See, the girl's father was a man who was accused of killing his wife and child (the girl) when they disappeared years before. Convicted of their murder, he was in jail until DNA tests determined that the girl was really his "murdered" offspring. When he comes to collect her, there is a war of wills between him-rich, arrogant, self-centered-and Julia-caring, nurturing, mama-bear like. It was just one thing too many. The love stories were irrelevant to the main plot, and the added convolution of the father being a convicted killer who maybe isn't a killer but is still a "bad guy" pushed it into the absurd.
Bottom line, I wasn't really feeling this one by the end. But I did finish it, so that's something, I suppose. So, lovers of Lifetime movies, have at it!

story of a psychiatrist named Julia who must flee her practice in disgrace after a scandal involving a patient of hers who perpetrated a violent act at school. When her sister, the sheriff in the small town where they grew up, calls her to consult on a case, she sees both an escape hatch and a chance to earn some redemption. A little girl has shown up in the town-battered, bruised, malnourished, non-verbal, and animalistic. The sheriff wants Julia to assess the girl, and get her to tell them who she is. As Julia begins to work with the girl, she realizes that she has stumbled upon a feral child-a child who has essentially been raised without any normal human socialization. As Julia becomes closer to the girl, she is determined to protect her from any and all outside influences that might want to exploit her.
This is the first Hannah book I've read, and I will admit that the kind of women's fiction she writes (a la Lifetime movie) is not really my jam. But I was intrigued enough with the premise that I think I would have been OK with the book if only she had followed dear old Coco's advice. There is a LOT going on in this book. There's the scandal that sends Julia away from her lucrative Los Angeles practice; the feral girl; a love story between Julia and one of the doctors in town, who in turn has his own secret that he is protecting; a love story between the sheriff and one of her deputies; a rocky relationship between the two sisters that must be resolved; a group of psychiatrists who want to study the girl like a specimen in a jar; and finally, the girl's father. The girl's father and his back story was the last straw. See, the girl's father was a man who was accused of killing his wife and child (the girl) when they disappeared years before. Convicted of their murder, he was in jail until DNA tests determined that the girl was really his "murdered" offspring. When he comes to collect her, there is a war of wills between him-rich, arrogant, self-centered-and Julia-caring, nurturing, mama-bear like. It was just one thing too many. The love stories were irrelevant to the main plot, and the added convolution of the father being a convicted killer who maybe isn't a killer but is still a "bad guy" pushed it into the absurd.
Bottom line, I wasn't really feeling this one by the end. But I did finish it, so that's something, I suppose. So, lovers of Lifetime movies, have at it!
Wednesday, September 02, 2015
I tend to shy away from anything that could be considered "chick lit" . As a lesbian in her mid-40s, the stories of young women in search of a man, a career, and the perfect size 2 don't really speak to me much. So when The Art of Forgetting by Camille Pagan appeared as an unsolicited review request in my mailbox, I almost put it right in the donation bin. But something stopped me from sending it back out into the universe to find a more receptive reader. I've always been fascinated by the mysterious workings of the human brain. There is so much that we don't understand yet about how it works, about how much of what makes us "us" is merely structural or chemical in nature. This novel, while not heavy on scientific explanation, does at least present a rather unique take on the friendship story.
The main character and narrator, Marissa, has always played second fiddle to her charismatic best
friend Julia. Ever since junior high, when the popular Julia chose the rather unassuming Marissa as her best friend, the two have been inseparable, but there has never been any question of who is the more dominant in the relationship. Now young adults, Marissa and Julia live in New York. Julia is a talented ballet dancer, and Marissa is an editor at a magazine. Despite her career success, Marissa is still insecure in many ways. She is in a safe, happy, but not super-passionate relationship. She worries about her weight, and her clothes, and she second guesses her instincts at work. One day, Julia is hit by a car crossing the street. While her physical injuries are minor, she sustains brain damage that affects her memory, mood, and personality. Suddenly, it is Marissa who must take the lead in their relationship, causing her to finally deal with her feelings about a long-lost love she gave up in college because Julia told her to.
As you can imagine, said long-lost love shows back up in their lives, Marissa has to decide if she wants to give it a try with him or stay with her loyal but slightly boring boyfriend. She has to figure out who she is without Julia there to define her. She has to decide whether to stay in her current job, or take a chance that could bolster her career. Meanwhile, she is forced to go back home to Michigan, where she also has to deal with her weight obsessed mother and the feelings of inferiority she learned from her. Basically, everything that I usually don't like in a book finds a home in The Art of Forgetting. But for some reason, this time it mostly worked for me. I didn't get annoyed by the constant focus on weight, looks, and size. I wasn't impatient with the "I have to choose between this man and that man, because obviously NO man is not an option" storyline. I felt empathy for Julia, even though she was annoying before the accident left her sort of bitchy. There was enough heart behind the writing that while this book won't make any of my top ten lists, it did keep my attention, and overall I enjoyed it.
The main character and narrator, Marissa, has always played second fiddle to her charismatic best
friend Julia. Ever since junior high, when the popular Julia chose the rather unassuming Marissa as her best friend, the two have been inseparable, but there has never been any question of who is the more dominant in the relationship. Now young adults, Marissa and Julia live in New York. Julia is a talented ballet dancer, and Marissa is an editor at a magazine. Despite her career success, Marissa is still insecure in many ways. She is in a safe, happy, but not super-passionate relationship. She worries about her weight, and her clothes, and she second guesses her instincts at work. One day, Julia is hit by a car crossing the street. While her physical injuries are minor, she sustains brain damage that affects her memory, mood, and personality. Suddenly, it is Marissa who must take the lead in their relationship, causing her to finally deal with her feelings about a long-lost love she gave up in college because Julia told her to.
As you can imagine, said long-lost love shows back up in their lives, Marissa has to decide if she wants to give it a try with him or stay with her loyal but slightly boring boyfriend. She has to figure out who she is without Julia there to define her. She has to decide whether to stay in her current job, or take a chance that could bolster her career. Meanwhile, she is forced to go back home to Michigan, where she also has to deal with her weight obsessed mother and the feelings of inferiority she learned from her. Basically, everything that I usually don't like in a book finds a home in The Art of Forgetting. But for some reason, this time it mostly worked for me. I didn't get annoyed by the constant focus on weight, looks, and size. I wasn't impatient with the "I have to choose between this man and that man, because obviously NO man is not an option" storyline. I felt empathy for Julia, even though she was annoying before the accident left her sort of bitchy. There was enough heart behind the writing that while this book won't make any of my top ten lists, it did keep my attention, and overall I enjoyed it.
Friday, August 28, 2015

Hundreds of miles away in Vermont, Lucy Dudley reads the newspaper accounts of Katherine's tragedy, and feels drawn to reach out to her. Lucy, an elderly woman living by herself on a small farm in rural Vermont, feels an immediate kinship with Katherine. She is carrying her own scars, and a secret that she has kept for almost five decades. Despite the two women being complete strangers, Katherine accepts Lucy's invitation to recover on the farm, and a beautiful relationship begins to take shape.
Readers who are interested in issues of domestic violence and their aftermath should find lots to interest them in Alan G. Johnson's novel, The Thing and the Last. Johnson, who was best known to me as the author of The Gender Knot, a non-fiction book about unraveling patriarchy, does an excellent job writing female characters who humanize the travesty and tragedy that is domestic violence in modern American culture. While the first chapter moves at lightning speed, the rest of the action of the book is slow and measured, much like recovery itself. Katherine is so broken by her experiences that she is not sure whether she can ever find a life for herself worth living. Lucy, as constant and stubborn as a boulder, provides both a soft place for Katherine to land, and a strong foundation for rebuilding her shattered life. How can Katherine give up on herself when Lucy never does?
While I have never had the experiences Katherine or Lucy have lived through, I couldn't help but think as I read that EVERYONE needs a Lucy in their life. A person who doesn't judge, but accepts you with all of your flaws. A person who is a constant comforting presence, just by the very fact of her existence in your life. Bit by bit, Lucy helps Katherine manage her grief, providing the compass for getting through the darkness, and finding at least a glimpse of the light. This book is a beautiful testament to the power of friendship and platonic love between women, and the power of forgiveness and redemption.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
There is no lack of books about the effects of slavery in the antebellum South, and its lingering effects during the Jim Crow era, pre-Civil Rights Movement. And I've read a lot of them. So I will admit that when my book club chose this book as its March pick, I was sort of "meh" about the whole thing. The one thing that made me slightly more enthusiastic was the author. I'd read The Secret Life of Bees and The Mermaid's Chair, and I really enjoyed Kidd's style, and the way that she wrote her characters with such care and gentleness, even when they themselves are not caring or gentle, per se.
I should really stop questioning my book club's decisions (with one notable exception-I'm looking at you On Strike for Christmas!), because I got completely sucked into The Invention of Wings. Told from the alternating perspectives of a young plantation owner's daughter and the slave that she is "gifted" on her eleventh birthday, the book explores various types of oppression-based on race, class, gender, and religion-and their effect on both the oppressors and the oppressed. Sarah Grimke, the daughter of a plantation-owning member of South Carolina's elite, is horrified to be given her own slave for her birthday, and in her naivete tries to free the young woman that has been given to her as her maid. Sarah is sure that her father, who has allowed her access to his books and has encouraged her to speak her mind about issues in a way usually reserved for boys, will accede to her wishes and allow the young woman her freedom. When that doesn't happen, she tries to assuage her own guilt by treating Hetty, her slave, more as a friend than a servant, teaching her to read and allowing her to speak her mind freely in her presence. Hetty, for her part, has no illusions about the true nature of her relationship with Sarah, and despite the fairly kind treatment Hetty gets from her, she carries out small acts of rebellion. When Sarah's secret lessons are discovered, the consequences are swift and severe, and lead Sarah to contemplate what if anything she can do to dismantle the evils of human bondage and free herself from the stifling expectations of a Southern lady. Hetty, of course, is not planning to wait on Sarah or any other white folks to free her. She is determined that she will free herself. As the story unfolds, and both girls grow into strong, independent women, their relationship changes as they both try to find their freedom.
Far from being a typical white savior narrative, this book shows a much more realistic and balanced picture of the relationship between Hetty and Sarah. Hetty is fierce and outspoken with Sarah about the differences between them, and has conflicted feelings of gratitude, anger, disappointment, and even love towards her. Sarah, for her part, realizes while agitating for fair treatment of slaves that she herself is suffering oppression, as a woman of a certain class, that keeps her from having the impact on the world that she wishes. As Sarah becomes more certain that she is meant to fight against the evils of slavery, she also finds that she must fight to be heard, even among other abolitionists. Ultimately, both women end up saving themselves.
I should really stop questioning my book club's decisions (with one notable exception-I'm looking at you On Strike for Christmas!), because I got completely sucked into The Invention of Wings. Told from the alternating perspectives of a young plantation owner's daughter and the slave that she is "gifted" on her eleventh birthday, the book explores various types of oppression-based on race, class, gender, and religion-and their effect on both the oppressors and the oppressed. Sarah Grimke, the daughter of a plantation-owning member of South Carolina's elite, is horrified to be given her own slave for her birthday, and in her naivete tries to free the young woman that has been given to her as her maid. Sarah is sure that her father, who has allowed her access to his books and has encouraged her to speak her mind about issues in a way usually reserved for boys, will accede to her wishes and allow the young woman her freedom. When that doesn't happen, she tries to assuage her own guilt by treating Hetty, her slave, more as a friend than a servant, teaching her to read and allowing her to speak her mind freely in her presence. Hetty, for her part, has no illusions about the true nature of her relationship with Sarah, and despite the fairly kind treatment Hetty gets from her, she carries out small acts of rebellion. When Sarah's secret lessons are discovered, the consequences are swift and severe, and lead Sarah to contemplate what if anything she can do to dismantle the evils of human bondage and free herself from the stifling expectations of a Southern lady. Hetty, of course, is not planning to wait on Sarah or any other white folks to free her. She is determined that she will free herself. As the story unfolds, and both girls grow into strong, independent women, their relationship changes as they both try to find their freedom.
Far from being a typical white savior narrative, this book shows a much more realistic and balanced picture of the relationship between Hetty and Sarah. Hetty is fierce and outspoken with Sarah about the differences between them, and has conflicted feelings of gratitude, anger, disappointment, and even love towards her. Sarah, for her part, realizes while agitating for fair treatment of slaves that she herself is suffering oppression, as a woman of a certain class, that keeps her from having the impact on the world that she wishes. As Sarah becomes more certain that she is meant to fight against the evils of slavery, she also finds that she must fight to be heard, even among other abolitionists. Ultimately, both women end up saving themselves.
Sunday, September 07, 2014

weeks to share their thoughts and feelings with others. And given the current propensity for over-sharing that has taken over our social media culture, we are used to knowing what everyone is thinking all the time (whether we want to or not). But in the past, when people were expected to be more circumspect in their personal communication, they had to be creative about sharing their true feelings, especially with someone with whom they hoped to be romatically involved.
The Victorians developed a way to share their feelings of love, desire, and jealousy through the language of flowers. When it would have been inappropriate to tell a woman that you desired her with words, you could send her a bouquet of red roses, and your meaning would be clear. Eventually they developed a floral symbol for almost any emotion you can think of. Some of those meanings have carried over to today, but many have been lost. Vanessa Diffenbaugh uses this old-fashioned idea as the basis of her novel, The Language of Flowers. The main character, Victoria, is an 18 year old foster child. After having lived in group homes for most of her life, she is being emancipated. Without any family or resources, she quickly finds herself living in a public park. Victoria describes herself as misanthropic; she disdains personal connection, and wants only to spend her time cultivating the flowers that she loves. She eventually finds a job working as a florist, and becomes known in her San Francisco neighborhood for having the knack for choosing the perfect flowers for any occasion. She does this through her extensive knowledge of the language of flowers, which we discover over the course of the novel she learned from the one woman who ever showed her love or compassion as a child. As she navigates her first year on her own, she is forced to confront the pain and fear that has kept her from having the kind of connections with the people in her life that most of us take for granted.
I loved this book. I loved Victoria, not just in spite of her prickly nature but because of it. I loved that there were facts about and descriptions of flowers on nearly every page. I found myself completely sucked in to the world that Diffenbaugh created, to the point of losing all track of time in the real world. To me, this is the mark of a truly great story, when you are living so firmly in the fictional world the author has created that it feels more real that the world you are actually sitting in. After working for over 20 years in the public school system, I recognized students I have known over the years in Victoria. And I recognized myself and other adults I know in some of the people who try to help her. Most of the characters-her boss, her boyfriend, the woman who took her in as a child-all walk that fine line between accepting her for who she is and encouraging her to allow others into her lonely life. Diffenbaugh offers up a hopeful story of love, loss, and forgiveness that completely drew me in.
Friday, August 08, 2014
While support for the death penalty seems to be a forgone conclusion in the United States, most other developed nations long ago gave up the practice. Regardless of how you as an individual American may feel about the morality and effectiveness of the ultimate punishment, surveys show that many people around the world find it odd that we have such a strong attachment to it. I don't actually have evidence to support what I'm about to write, but I suspect that the people of Iceland would be among them. At least, based on the fact that the last person to be executed in Iceland was over 150 years ago. In her novel, Burial Rites, Hannah Kent uses the real-life case of the last people to be put to death under the death penalty in Iceland as the basis for a book has been labeled a mystery, though I think it could just as easily be called historical fiction, for its examination of the intersection of religion and law in Icelandic society. Or women's fiction, as it examines the role of women in a society that I imagine very few American's have much experience with.
Agnes Magnusdottir has been convicted of murdering her lover. While awaiting execution, she is sent to a remote farm to live with a district official and his family. Escape is essentially impossible, since no one could survive in the wilderness for long. While there, she is expected to meet with a spiritual advisor in order to repent and make her peace with God before meeting Him face to face to be judged. The wife of the district official is at first very resistant, but as Agnes works with the family, and her story comes out, it becomes clear that executing her would be a miscarriage of justice.
Kent uses a combination of third person and first person narrative (from Agnes' point of view) to tell the story. Agnes' story is revealed both through the comments of the other characters and her own thoughts. The official documents that were included, and the conversations of the other characters about Agnes, are then given context when the truth from Agnes' point of view is revealed.
What really sets this book apart from other books in this genre is the setting. Otherwise it's a sadly familiar story of a woman who was taken advantage of by a man she loved. But the description of Icelandic culture and the interesting narrative structure help this novel stand out from other similar mysteries, even ones with historical settings. I look forward to seeing if Kent's future books will continue to offer familiar stories with engaging twists.
Agnes Magnusdottir has been convicted of murdering her lover. While awaiting execution, she is sent to a remote farm to live with a district official and his family. Escape is essentially impossible, since no one could survive in the wilderness for long. While there, she is expected to meet with a spiritual advisor in order to repent and make her peace with God before meeting Him face to face to be judged. The wife of the district official is at first very resistant, but as Agnes works with the family, and her story comes out, it becomes clear that executing her would be a miscarriage of justice.
Kent uses a combination of third person and first person narrative (from Agnes' point of view) to tell the story. Agnes' story is revealed both through the comments of the other characters and her own thoughts. The official documents that were included, and the conversations of the other characters about Agnes, are then given context when the truth from Agnes' point of view is revealed.
What really sets this book apart from other books in this genre is the setting. Otherwise it's a sadly familiar story of a woman who was taken advantage of by a man she loved. But the description of Icelandic culture and the interesting narrative structure help this novel stand out from other similar mysteries, even ones with historical settings. I look forward to seeing if Kent's future books will continue to offer familiar stories with engaging twists.
Saturday, July 26, 2014

Mandela's release from prison should continue to serve their sentences. She is forced to confront her own personal demons from her time in Cape Town, and the reasons that she will do anything, including putting herself in harm's way, to avoid making the kind of connections that would tie her to one person or place.
I really enjoyed the other book by Amanda Eyre Ward that I read, Sleep Toward Heaven. Like that book, Forgive Me deals with forgiveness and redemption. The book is told alternately from Nadine's perspective and the diary of a young boy who, like Nadine herself, is desperate to leave his small town life behind for fame and fortune in the wider world. Nadine's story is told through a series of flashbacks to her first time in South Africa, and how it affected her in the present. At times it was really hard to like Nadine. She used her journalistic liberalness as a shield for her own selfishness. After all, how angry can you be when you have offered a person your house on Nantucket Island as a refuge when they leave with no notice to pursue the story of bringing a young man's murderer to justice. Being a journalist allowed Nadine a certain distance from being personally connected to the things that were happening to the people around her, including the people that she considered friends.
Some of the characters were pretty one dimensional, especially Nadine's stepmother, and both of her love interests. To be honest, I'm not sure if this was lazy storytelling or purposeful. After all, Nadine didn't really see other people except as they related to herself. The boy whose journal we are privy to was much more real than any of the other characters in the book, but I spent most of the book wondering what connection his story had to the rest of the narrative, other than his intense desire to get out of his small Cape Cod town. Once I realized who he was, it made a little more sense, but I feel like Ward never really connected the dots between Nadine and the other mothers.
The strange thing is that despite all of the flaws I found in the writing, I still really enjoyed the book. It was an easy read, and the story of what happened to the people during the struggle to end apartheid and the aftermath of Nelson Madela's election as president were engaging enough to keep me reading. The story was billed as one about motherhood, which I didn't really get. To me, it was more about gaining forgiveness, both from the people that you have wronged and yourself. After years of running away, Nadine needed to stay somewhere long enough to see the ramifications of her own choices, and to fulfill commitments she made to people in order to help them find justice in an unjust world.
Tuesday, October 08, 2013

cream-on-the-couch.
Jodi and her common law husband Todd live a charmed life. Todd, a successful developer, and Jodi, a part-time therapist, live in a luxury condominium right on Lake Michigan in the Chicago Gold Coast. While from the outside their marriage looks charmed, within the relationship there is nothing but coldness and a lack of true connection. Todd is a serial philanderer, and in order to keep their lives from completely falling apart, Jodi chooses to live in the state of denial. But soon, Jodi realizes that Todd is not content to play the part of loving husband. He is looking for a way to leave her, and as he slips away, so too does her sanity, until finally she makes her way inexorably towards a decision she can never take back.
The story is told from alternating perspectives, first Jodi's, the Todd's. The voices change chapter to chapter, so unlike Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn (to which this book has often been compared), you are reading about all of the events in real time in the story. This book is defintely no Gone Girl. It does not rise to the leve of dark and twisty that Flynn's book portrayed. Honestly, the female character in that book was just evil. Jodi is not evil, nor is she a sociopath, but she is someone who has been deeply scarred in the past, so deeply that she doesn't even remember what happened to her that created this ability to compartmentalize to such an extreme. Once her inner boundaries start to fall, however, she begins to realize just how big a lie she has really been living. The Silent Wife starts out slowly, and the writing style and plot stay rather understated. But despite the sometimes clinical feeling of the writing, especially the parts narrated by Jodi, the ending has a satisfying emotional jolt that made the effort to read it worth it.
Monday, July 15, 2013

am shamelessly paraphrasing here) that trying to pick your five favorite books is like trying to decide which five limbs you don't need. I can tell you books I've loved recently, or books I loved at various stages of my life. I can tell you I loved a book I forgot I even read if you remind me what it's about! My "favorite" book is a function of who I am today, and tomorrow that could change.
There are, however, a few books that moved me so profoundly that they are permanently fixed in my "favorites" category. I prefer to call them "book you should read before you die". One of those books is A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini. It is a true masterpiece, raw and powerful, a master class on creating rich settings and authentic characters. Now, Hosseini is back with another story about the history and people of Afghanistan. This time, he explores not just Afghan culture, but how the intersection of Afghan and Western culture affects his characters.
And the Mountains Echoed begins with an Afghan folktale about a father's love for his daughter. That theme runs throughout the novel, with characters finding these familial relationships tested by poverty and secrets and history. The book highlights the many ways that families can nurture or hurt each other, and the many sacrifices that we make in an effort to give our children the best possible chance in life. The narrator changes at different points in the story, as the action moves from the Afghan countryside to Kabul to Europe and America. The characters are all connected to each other in a delicate web of relationships-parents, children, siblings, spouses. The plot is intricately crafted, with each section picking up from the one previous in ways that show the interconnectedness of us all.
The most poignant part for me was the relationship between chauffeur Nabi and his rich employer. Despite the fact that Nabi is the catalyst for one of the most heart-wrenching betrayals in the book, through his story you are able to see his inherent goodness and compassion. When his employer's wife deserts him after a sudden illness, it is left to Nabi to stay and take care of him, and the relationship that develops shows how deeply Hosseini understands the ties that bind us to the people we love, even outside of blood relations.
Hosseini does his usual good job exposing the inequalities of men and women in Afghan society, in a way that is not politicized or overly dramatic. Each of the female characters in forced by circumstance to either conform to the gender roles assigned to them, or to escape. Parwana is bound to her village in order to care for her disabled sister, and lives a desperate life of unfulfilled dreams of love. Nila Wahdati, spoiled daughter of a wealthy family, writes poems about love, desire, and sex in 1950s Kabul, and is ultimately driven away from her husband and her country to escape the beautiful cage she felt she was living in. Though she is by no means a sympathetic character, you can't help but feel sad for her desperate attempts to find love and happiness outside of herself, since she never finds it within. Even the female characters who never lived in Afghanistan, the daughters of the original main characters, struggle to meet the responsibilities that their parents place on them as good Afghan women. And the Mountains Echoed is not on my "read before you die" list, but it is definitely one of my favorites of the moment.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Some families are gifted with a creative streak that seems to be encoded in the DNA. That is how artistic
dynasties such as the Barrymores and the Fondas are born. While both of those famous families shared their gifts mostly in front of the camera, they would be nothing without the efforts of people like the Ephrons. Delia Ephron, author of The Lion is In, is one of four sisters born to a Jewish family in Beverly Hills. The most famous of the sisters is probably Norah, who was nominated three times for an Academy award for Original Screenplay, and who won the BAFTA for her movie When Harry Met Sally. Sadly, Norah died of complications from leukemia in 2012, but her sisters-writers all-are carrying on the family tradition of excellence in screenwriting and journalism.
Delia Ephron is probably best known for her screenplay for You've Got Mail, but she has also written several books for both adults and young people. Her 2012 novel, The Lion is In, is a quirky novel, part Boys on the Side, part Thelma and Louise, that showcases the usual cast of lovable, flawed female characters. We start with Lana and Tracee-Lana, a recovering alcoholic with an anger problem, and her best friend Tracee, runaway bride (at least, she convinced herself she was going to be a bride) and kleptomaniac. On the run from the police, they pick up Rita walking along the side of the road. Rita is running away from her Holy Roller husband and stifling life. When their car breaks down in the middle of nowhere, they are forced to find shelter in a run-down night club, where they meet Marcel. Marcel will have a profound effect on all of their lives, helping each of them figure out something important about themselves that allows them to find the strength to take control of their lives. Oh, and for what it's worth, Marcel is a lion.
In true female buddy story style, the plot plays out like a comedy of errors, with lots of slightly ridiculous situations interspersed with moments of insight. The most moving of the storylines is Rita's. While Tracee and Lana both created a lot of their own problems through bad life choices, Rita's life was the result of falling into a bad marriage, and being bullied into submission by her domineering husband. This very short novel is not long on substance, but it is an enjoyable read, with enough quirks to make it interesting, despite the somewhat cliched themes about women finding their own power.
dynasties such as the Barrymores and the Fondas are born. While both of those famous families shared their gifts mostly in front of the camera, they would be nothing without the efforts of people like the Ephrons. Delia Ephron, author of The Lion is In, is one of four sisters born to a Jewish family in Beverly Hills. The most famous of the sisters is probably Norah, who was nominated three times for an Academy award for Original Screenplay, and who won the BAFTA for her movie When Harry Met Sally. Sadly, Norah died of complications from leukemia in 2012, but her sisters-writers all-are carrying on the family tradition of excellence in screenwriting and journalism.
Delia Ephron is probably best known for her screenplay for You've Got Mail, but she has also written several books for both adults and young people. Her 2012 novel, The Lion is In, is a quirky novel, part Boys on the Side, part Thelma and Louise, that showcases the usual cast of lovable, flawed female characters. We start with Lana and Tracee-Lana, a recovering alcoholic with an anger problem, and her best friend Tracee, runaway bride (at least, she convinced herself she was going to be a bride) and kleptomaniac. On the run from the police, they pick up Rita walking along the side of the road. Rita is running away from her Holy Roller husband and stifling life. When their car breaks down in the middle of nowhere, they are forced to find shelter in a run-down night club, where they meet Marcel. Marcel will have a profound effect on all of their lives, helping each of them figure out something important about themselves that allows them to find the strength to take control of their lives. Oh, and for what it's worth, Marcel is a lion.
In true female buddy story style, the plot plays out like a comedy of errors, with lots of slightly ridiculous situations interspersed with moments of insight. The most moving of the storylines is Rita's. While Tracee and Lana both created a lot of their own problems through bad life choices, Rita's life was the result of falling into a bad marriage, and being bullied into submission by her domineering husband. This very short novel is not long on substance, but it is an enjoyable read, with enough quirks to make it interesting, despite the somewhat cliched themes about women finding their own power.
Monday, June 04, 2012
Conservatives love to harken back to the good ol' days, when men and women knew their roles and the family was strong and sacred. In fact, the main argument that conservatives have against gay marriage is that we were all so much better off when the nuclear family was defined as a husband and his obedient wife and children.
Here's the thing-that ideal was never the norm. Sure, there were families that resembled the 1950's stereotype a la Leave It to Beaver, but look at the statistic about how many poor mothers had to work, and how many middle-class mothers had substance abuse problems, and they tell a different story. This state of affairs is beautifully illustrated in A. Manette Ansay in her novel Vinegar Hill. Vinegar Hill tells the story of Ellen Grier and her family in 1960s Wisconsin. When her husband loses his job in Illinois, he moves the wife and kids back to their hometown to stay with his parents. Ellen, a school-teacher from a devout Catholic family, chafes under her mother-in-law's disapproval and her father-in-laws cruelty. Her husband find living with the father who abused him as a child drains all energy and ambition from him. He turns away from his wife and their children, paralyzed by his memories and his crushing fear that he will not be able to keep his family safe. Underlying all of this misery is a family secret that has warped the minds and hearts of everyone involved, creating antipathy and unhappiness.
Much of the novel focuses on the strict gender roles that each member of the family was expected to play. Ellen's mother-in-law and her own mother are disapproving of her career, believing that she should be at home taking care of the children. Her father-in-law believes himself to be the head of his wife, and expects her-and everyone else-to submit to his every command. The crushing disappointment that Ellen feels in her marriage and the feeling of being trapped in an unhappy life lead her to take long walks alone at night, and eventually leads to substance abuse. Her mother-in-law is just as unhappy, having lived her adult life under the thumb of an abusive husband. And her husband's unmarried aunt is perhaps the most miserable, feeling as she does that she was never able to measure up to her more attractive sister, and bearing most of the guilt for the family secret that eventually comes to light.
An action-packed novel this is not. What action there is takes place almost exclusively within the narrow confines of the family home. But despite that, the novel feels full. Full of repressed emotions, quiet sadness, mini-explosions of anger. Ansay has captured the slow, inexorable march of the unfulfilled life. Even when Ellen makes a decision that will better the lives of her and her children it doesn't feel joyous. It's just another sad event in the sad life of a sad woman. But Ansay leaves us with hope that things can and will get better for Ellen, even if she and her children are the only ones who pull themselves out of the emotional morass that is their family.
Here's the thing-that ideal was never the norm. Sure, there were families that resembled the 1950's stereotype a la Leave It to Beaver, but look at the statistic about how many poor mothers had to work, and how many middle-class mothers had substance abuse problems, and they tell a different story. This state of affairs is beautifully illustrated in A. Manette Ansay in her novel Vinegar Hill. Vinegar Hill tells the story of Ellen Grier and her family in 1960s Wisconsin. When her husband loses his job in Illinois, he moves the wife and kids back to their hometown to stay with his parents. Ellen, a school-teacher from a devout Catholic family, chafes under her mother-in-law's disapproval and her father-in-laws cruelty. Her husband find living with the father who abused him as a child drains all energy and ambition from him. He turns away from his wife and their children, paralyzed by his memories and his crushing fear that he will not be able to keep his family safe. Underlying all of this misery is a family secret that has warped the minds and hearts of everyone involved, creating antipathy and unhappiness.
Much of the novel focuses on the strict gender roles that each member of the family was expected to play. Ellen's mother-in-law and her own mother are disapproving of her career, believing that she should be at home taking care of the children. Her father-in-law believes himself to be the head of his wife, and expects her-and everyone else-to submit to his every command. The crushing disappointment that Ellen feels in her marriage and the feeling of being trapped in an unhappy life lead her to take long walks alone at night, and eventually leads to substance abuse. Her mother-in-law is just as unhappy, having lived her adult life under the thumb of an abusive husband. And her husband's unmarried aunt is perhaps the most miserable, feeling as she does that she was never able to measure up to her more attractive sister, and bearing most of the guilt for the family secret that eventually comes to light.
An action-packed novel this is not. What action there is takes place almost exclusively within the narrow confines of the family home. But despite that, the novel feels full. Full of repressed emotions, quiet sadness, mini-explosions of anger. Ansay has captured the slow, inexorable march of the unfulfilled life. Even when Ellen makes a decision that will better the lives of her and her children it doesn't feel joyous. It's just another sad event in the sad life of a sad woman. But Ansay leaves us with hope that things can and will get better for Ellen, even if she and her children are the only ones who pull themselves out of the emotional morass that is their family.
Monday, May 28, 2012
Adolescence is a time of transition, a time in a child's life when they are not yet adults, but not really children. This makes it a challenge to decide how to deal with them-finding a balance between supervision and freedom, support and independence, is something that parents and society struggle with. And when the adolescent commits a crime, we as a society have trouble finding that balance-are they children who cannot be held accountable for their choices, or are they adults who have defied societal standards and must be punished. I was reminded of this dilemma while reading Heather Gudekauf's novel These Things Hidden.
These Things Hidden interweaves the lives of four women-Allison, Brynn, Charm, and Claire. Five years earlier, 16 year old Allison was convicted of manslaughter in the death of her newborn infant. Released from prison early, she goes to a half-way house and tries to reconnect with her sister, Brynn. Brynn, who at 15 was with her sister on that awful night, has borne the brunt of the fall-out of her sister's crime. Emotionally fragile, bearing the guilt of the infant's death, she struggles to get through each day. Charm, a 20 year old college student, carries a secret that makes it difficult for her to deal with the imminent death of her step-father. Claire, a bookstore owner, marvels daily at the miracle that brought her son Joshua into her life-after years of trying to have a child, she and her husband adopted Joshua after he was left at the fire station as a newborn. None of these women know it, but Joshua is the one thing that connects them all.
Told in the first person by Allison and Brynn, with chapters in the third person for Charm and Claire, this book is about more than just the fairness of holding a 16 year old responsible for the death of her child. It is about family, what it means to be a mother, a sister, a caregiver. Allison and Brynn's parents appeared perfect from the outside, giving their girls every advantage. But emotionally there was very little connection in their family, and when first Allison and then Brynn disappoint them, their parents turn away from them. Charm's mother collected men like trading cards for many years, and Charm feels much closer to her stepfather Gus than to her biological parents. Obviously simply giving birth to a child does not make a person a parent. Claire and her husband are excellent parents to Joshua, but they live with the fear at the back of their mind that his biological parents could show up and ruin their happiness. Gudenkauf paints a portrait of love and guilt and fear and love again through the stories of these women and the ways they are connected to Joshua, and to each other. This novel is women's fiction at its best. Not overly sentimental or sappy, with no easy solutions, the book explores relationships and family in a way that is insightful and engaging.
These Things Hidden interweaves the lives of four women-Allison, Brynn, Charm, and Claire. Five years earlier, 16 year old Allison was convicted of manslaughter in the death of her newborn infant. Released from prison early, she goes to a half-way house and tries to reconnect with her sister, Brynn. Brynn, who at 15 was with her sister on that awful night, has borne the brunt of the fall-out of her sister's crime. Emotionally fragile, bearing the guilt of the infant's death, she struggles to get through each day. Charm, a 20 year old college student, carries a secret that makes it difficult for her to deal with the imminent death of her step-father. Claire, a bookstore owner, marvels daily at the miracle that brought her son Joshua into her life-after years of trying to have a child, she and her husband adopted Joshua after he was left at the fire station as a newborn. None of these women know it, but Joshua is the one thing that connects them all.
Told in the first person by Allison and Brynn, with chapters in the third person for Charm and Claire, this book is about more than just the fairness of holding a 16 year old responsible for the death of her child. It is about family, what it means to be a mother, a sister, a caregiver. Allison and Brynn's parents appeared perfect from the outside, giving their girls every advantage. But emotionally there was very little connection in their family, and when first Allison and then Brynn disappoint them, their parents turn away from them. Charm's mother collected men like trading cards for many years, and Charm feels much closer to her stepfather Gus than to her biological parents. Obviously simply giving birth to a child does not make a person a parent. Claire and her husband are excellent parents to Joshua, but they live with the fear at the back of their mind that his biological parents could show up and ruin their happiness. Gudenkauf paints a portrait of love and guilt and fear and love again through the stories of these women and the ways they are connected to Joshua, and to each other. This novel is women's fiction at its best. Not overly sentimental or sappy, with no easy solutions, the book explores relationships and family in a way that is insightful and engaging.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Good morning, fellow Monday Morning Readers! It's been a long time since I have been able to participate in a weekly meme of any kind, so welcome to Book Addict Reviews any fellow bloggers who have not been here before! I'm glad to be back!
This week, I finished When She Woke by Hillary Jordan. Amazing speculative fiction a la The Handmaid's Tale about a woman's place in society and reproductive choice.
I am also reading The Latte Rebellion, by Sarah Jamila Stevenson. This young adult novel tells the story of a group of mixed race friends who start a website to sell t-shirts to people with latte-colored skin as a way to raise money for a summer vacation. What starts as a joke about their shared experiences as people of mixed racial backgrounds becomes a social justice movement, leading to serious consequences for the girls when their school labels them terrorists.
I'm about to start My Name is Mary Sutter, a historical fiction novel about a woman fighting to be recognized for her medical skills in the mid-18th century. I guess I must be on a feminist fiction kick right now, since the last few things I have read are falling in that theme. Given the current state of political discourse about women in this country, I guess maybe that makes sense...
Finally, I am listening to The Grapes of Wrath on audiobook. I'm glad that I decided to listen rather than read it, because I really feel like the narrator is doing a wonderful job with the character's voices and emotions. It is the tale of the Joad family-chased off their land during the Depression by the landowners and their tractors, the family takes off west in a converted jalopy, hoping to find work and prosperity in the promised land of California. Heartbreaking, infuriating, filled with moments of quiet grace, this American classic is a must read.
Have a wonderful reading week, everyone!
This week, I finished When She Woke by Hillary Jordan. Amazing speculative fiction a la The Handmaid's Tale about a woman's place in society and reproductive choice.
I am also reading The Latte Rebellion, by Sarah Jamila Stevenson. This young adult novel tells the story of a group of mixed race friends who start a website to sell t-shirts to people with latte-colored skin as a way to raise money for a summer vacation. What starts as a joke about their shared experiences as people of mixed racial backgrounds becomes a social justice movement, leading to serious consequences for the girls when their school labels them terrorists.
I'm about to start My Name is Mary Sutter, a historical fiction novel about a woman fighting to be recognized for her medical skills in the mid-18th century. I guess I must be on a feminist fiction kick right now, since the last few things I have read are falling in that theme. Given the current state of political discourse about women in this country, I guess maybe that makes sense...
Finally, I am listening to The Grapes of Wrath on audiobook. I'm glad that I decided to listen rather than read it, because I really feel like the narrator is doing a wonderful job with the character's voices and emotions. It is the tale of the Joad family-chased off their land during the Depression by the landowners and their tractors, the family takes off west in a converted jalopy, hoping to find work and prosperity in the promised land of California. Heartbreaking, infuriating, filled with moments of quiet grace, this American classic is a must read.
Have a wonderful reading week, everyone!
Sunday, April 22, 2012
I think I have mentioned here on the blog before that while I was raised by a feminist and called myself a feminist even as a young teen, I didn't really get feminism until I read Margaret Atwood's A Handmaid's Tale. Atwood is a master of speculative fiction, and her chilling vision of what might become of women in a future where our reproduction is controlled by men made me understand just how precious freedom of choice is, and how hard we have to work to ensure it.
While The Handmaid's Tale is powerful and disturbing, at the time it was written the fictional future it reflected, while not unrealistic, felt far away. The near future world created by Hillary Jordan in her speculative fiction novel, When She Woke, feels frighteningly plausible and terrifyingly close. Centered around the same themes as Atwood's classic feminist novel, but updated with 21st century geo-politics and technology, When She Woke tells the story of Hannah, a young woman from a fundamentalist religious background, who was convicted of murder after getting an illegal abortion. In this near future, a sexually transmitted disease, carried by men but affecting only women, has rendered a large portion of the female population infertile. In the panic that ensued, the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. In addition, an economic depression led to the closure of prisons in favor of melachroming convicted criminals-literally changing their skin color to green or yellow or blue or red depending on their crime. Hannah wakes up as a Red, the color of murderers. When she is released from her detention, she becomes a social outcast. Her family essentially disowns her for taking the life of her unborn child, and they send her to an enlightenment camp to try and "save" her and help her return to God. But enlightenment means facing daily cruelty and abuse, and eventually Hannah is forced to leave. Thus begins a journey from powerless to powerful; from weakness to strength; from blind, unquestioning faith to a new understanding of God and his relationship to the evil "others"-atheists, homosexuals, abortionists, socialists, non-Christians-she has always been taught to fear and hate.
The title refers not just to the day that Hannah woke up as a Red, but to the very real awakening of her ability to think for herself, to question her almost slavish devotion to her evangelical brand of Christianity, to envision a life for herself where she decides her path, rather than having it laid out before her by her father and then her husband. The real world is a shock to someone as sheltered from it has Hannah had been. Hannah comes to understand that morality is much more complex than the narrow, black-and-white worldview of her conservative faith. How to rationalize the cruelty of her fellow Christians, or the kindness of the unsaved, when she has been taught that strict adherence to God's law-as interpreted by preachers, fathers, and husbands-is the only way to please God and achieve a place in heaven.
When She Woke lacks the amazing facility with language that Atwood's work always displays. But what it lacks in literary-ness it makes up for in strong characterization and a quick-paced, exciting story. Hannah has a rich internal life, and the journey that she takes-both physical and spiritual-as a result of her status as a Chrome is deeply moving. But what struck me even more was how authentic the made-up future felt. Global pandemic, war with Iran, water wars in Africa, the rise of religious fundamentalism...every one a possible outcome of the current state of our world. Is it implausible that Iran could get a nuclear weapon and bomb the US? It might not be likely, but it's certainly not impossible. Experts have been warning about wars over water for at least the last decade. Bird flu, swine flu, SARS-we've seen just how our increasingly global culture can lead to the spread of disease. And the beliefs of the religious extremists in this book are awfully close to the Pat Robertson/Rick Santorum version of today-except it has become the law of the land. How much would it take for the Promise Keepers to become the fictional Fist of God-a group that hunts down and exterminates anyone it perceives as immoral? When She Woke is a powerful wake-up call for anyone who cares about reproductive rights, the separation of church and state, or social justice.
While The Handmaid's Tale is powerful and disturbing, at the time it was written the fictional future it reflected, while not unrealistic, felt far away. The near future world created by Hillary Jordan in her speculative fiction novel, When She Woke, feels frighteningly plausible and terrifyingly close. Centered around the same themes as Atwood's classic feminist novel, but updated with 21st century geo-politics and technology, When She Woke tells the story of Hannah, a young woman from a fundamentalist religious background, who was convicted of murder after getting an illegal abortion. In this near future, a sexually transmitted disease, carried by men but affecting only women, has rendered a large portion of the female population infertile. In the panic that ensued, the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. In addition, an economic depression led to the closure of prisons in favor of melachroming convicted criminals-literally changing their skin color to green or yellow or blue or red depending on their crime. Hannah wakes up as a Red, the color of murderers. When she is released from her detention, she becomes a social outcast. Her family essentially disowns her for taking the life of her unborn child, and they send her to an enlightenment camp to try and "save" her and help her return to God. But enlightenment means facing daily cruelty and abuse, and eventually Hannah is forced to leave. Thus begins a journey from powerless to powerful; from weakness to strength; from blind, unquestioning faith to a new understanding of God and his relationship to the evil "others"-atheists, homosexuals, abortionists, socialists, non-Christians-she has always been taught to fear and hate.
The title refers not just to the day that Hannah woke up as a Red, but to the very real awakening of her ability to think for herself, to question her almost slavish devotion to her evangelical brand of Christianity, to envision a life for herself where she decides her path, rather than having it laid out before her by her father and then her husband. The real world is a shock to someone as sheltered from it has Hannah had been. Hannah comes to understand that morality is much more complex than the narrow, black-and-white worldview of her conservative faith. How to rationalize the cruelty of her fellow Christians, or the kindness of the unsaved, when she has been taught that strict adherence to God's law-as interpreted by preachers, fathers, and husbands-is the only way to please God and achieve a place in heaven.
When She Woke lacks the amazing facility with language that Atwood's work always displays. But what it lacks in literary-ness it makes up for in strong characterization and a quick-paced, exciting story. Hannah has a rich internal life, and the journey that she takes-both physical and spiritual-as a result of her status as a Chrome is deeply moving. But what struck me even more was how authentic the made-up future felt. Global pandemic, war with Iran, water wars in Africa, the rise of religious fundamentalism...every one a possible outcome of the current state of our world. Is it implausible that Iran could get a nuclear weapon and bomb the US? It might not be likely, but it's certainly not impossible. Experts have been warning about wars over water for at least the last decade. Bird flu, swine flu, SARS-we've seen just how our increasingly global culture can lead to the spread of disease. And the beliefs of the religious extremists in this book are awfully close to the Pat Robertson/Rick Santorum version of today-except it has become the law of the land. How much would it take for the Promise Keepers to become the fictional Fist of God-a group that hunts down and exterminates anyone it perceives as immoral? When She Woke is a powerful wake-up call for anyone who cares about reproductive rights, the separation of church and state, or social justice.
Saturday, April 07, 2012
I will admit it- hell, I have admitted it. A rather large (too large?) part of my identity is wrapped up in not just being a reader, but in being well-read. Sure, I've lied about reading books that I really only started and couldn't finish because they are high-faultin' classics that make me sound smart...haven't we all? (please, don't judge). But just this once I am going to come clean-I was defeated by George Eliot and her classic Middlemarch.
There is nothing about Middlemarch that I shouldn't love as a reader and a feminist. Female author fools the world by writing as a man to get her novel about a young woman bucking the system taken seriously. With themes of a women's role in society, religious hypocrisy, and political reform-if this book was tea I would want to drink it. But apparently the book itself is better for me in the abstract than in the reality. I simply could not get through it.
I first tried to read it in college, during a summer when I was determined to read the classics-with-a-capital-C. I re-read Jane Eyre that summer, as well as Wuthering Heights, The Old Man and The Sea, and A Tale of Two Cities. But when I tried to read Middlemarch, I found myself putting it down in favor of doing things like, oh, scrubbing the grout with a toothbrush or hand-waxing my 10 year old Renault. I was relieved when it came time to go back to school and have an excuse to put it aside "for the semester"-you know, if a semester lasted 20 years.
OK, enter the advent of digital audiobooks. Surely, if I could listen to a really good narrator read the words aloud, I would be able to get invested in the emotional life of the characters and not be distracted by the old-fashioned language. Surely, the voice of the narrator would bring to life the long passages where Dorothea is rhapsodizing about Mr. Casaubon in her head, all he's-so-righteous-so-what-if-he-is-pedantic-and-old-and-not-that-attractive. "And the audio version is 30 hours long, so I will certainly get my money's worth!", thought I. Well, there's $14.95 wasted...I couldn't even get through the first two hours. I listen as I drive, and I found my thoughts drifting to such an extent that I would realize I was home and could not list one event from the preceding 25 minutes. So, I hereby admit defeat. Go ahead and feel smug, all you Smarty McSmartypants who actually read this book. Hmmmm, or did you?
There is nothing about Middlemarch that I shouldn't love as a reader and a feminist. Female author fools the world by writing as a man to get her novel about a young woman bucking the system taken seriously. With themes of a women's role in society, religious hypocrisy, and political reform-if this book was tea I would want to drink it. But apparently the book itself is better for me in the abstract than in the reality. I simply could not get through it.
I first tried to read it in college, during a summer when I was determined to read the classics-with-a-capital-C. I re-read Jane Eyre that summer, as well as Wuthering Heights, The Old Man and The Sea, and A Tale of Two Cities. But when I tried to read Middlemarch, I found myself putting it down in favor of doing things like, oh, scrubbing the grout with a toothbrush or hand-waxing my 10 year old Renault. I was relieved when it came time to go back to school and have an excuse to put it aside "for the semester"-you know, if a semester lasted 20 years.
OK, enter the advent of digital audiobooks. Surely, if I could listen to a really good narrator read the words aloud, I would be able to get invested in the emotional life of the characters and not be distracted by the old-fashioned language. Surely, the voice of the narrator would bring to life the long passages where Dorothea is rhapsodizing about Mr. Casaubon in her head, all he's-so-righteous-so-what-if-he-is-pedantic-and-old-and-not-that-attractive. "And the audio version is 30 hours long, so I will certainly get my money's worth!", thought I. Well, there's $14.95 wasted...I couldn't even get through the first two hours. I listen as I drive, and I found my thoughts drifting to such an extent that I would realize I was home and could not list one event from the preceding 25 minutes. So, I hereby admit defeat. Go ahead and feel smug, all you Smarty McSmartypants who actually read this book. Hmmmm, or did you?
Saturday, December 24, 2011
For many years I prided myself on the fact that I never gave up on a book. Even if a book was not really doin' it for me, I stuck with it, sure that the author was trying to convey something that I just needed to work a little harder to pick up on. After all, they took the time and care to write the darn thing-I should at least put in the time and effort to finish it.
Then one day (perhaps struck by a growing sense of my own mortality) I decided that there are too many good books in the world to waste my precious reading time on bad ones, and I've put down many a snoozer since. But not my favorite authors. Surely if I have loved everything a person has ever written, then if I just keep slogging through one of their books I will find that moment of joy in the written word. Surely my favorite authors would not let me down?
Laura Lippman, I am sad to say, you've let me down.
Life Sentences is the story of Cassandra Fallows, an author who became successful writing about her father's infidelities and their affect on her. After writing a less-than-stellar novel, she goes home to Baltimore to mine her childhood friendships for another memoir, something that will take her back to her bestseller status. The irony is that in writing about an author who is afraid she's lost her mojo, Lippman has written a novel that shows that perhaps her mojo took a bit of a vacation.
The impetus for Cassandra's return to her childhood home is the story of an old schoolmate of hers who went to jail for seven years rather than reveal what happened to her infant, who disappeared and was never found. In revisiting her childhood friendships, Cassandra discovers just how fallible memory can be. Her old friends are upset with her portrayal of them in print, and they refuse to help her find their old classmate. Lots of intrigue ensues, revealing a conspiracy that involves politicians, blackmail, and twenty years of secrets.
To which I say "yawn". Lippman usually pairs really good character development with intriguing plots to create suspense novels that are not formulaic, but little windows into human behavior. Her novels usually carry some kind of emotional punch, but I found myself not really caring what happened to any of the characters, including the narrator. I made myself stick with it, partly for the reason above and partly because the mystery was (just) engaging enough to make me want to know how it resolved, but even the ending was a disappointment-more whimper than wow. Since this Lippman book is a stand-alone, I'd say skip it. Her Tess Monaghan books and other stand-alones are a much better use of your reading time!
Thursday, December 22, 2011
The experience of immigrant groups in the United States is something that has interested me ever since I took a multicultural education class a few years ago. I read some really moving testimonials from people of various immigrant groups (beginning with Italians and the Irish and moving on through Chinese, Japanese, and Mexican) describing their experiences (or the family stories passed down by their grandparents) and how their families never gave up on making it in America.
My own family immigration history is fairly recent. My paternal grandparents came to America in the early 20th century from Quebec. They settled in New England, in an area where there was already a community for them to join. While my great-grandparents spoke Quebecois French almost exclusively, it did not take long for my grandmother and grandfather to learn English and assimilate into mainstream American culture. My grandfather fought in World War II, and was proud to serve the nation he saw as his, even though he had only been in the US for half of his rather short life at that point.
We as a society have never been particularly welcoming to new arrivals, regardless of where they are from or what the words on the Statue of Liberty may imply about how inclusive we pretend we are. The myth propagated is that as long as immigrants are willing to work-hard and respect American values we will accept them with open arms. The reality is that every immigrant group has started out on the lowest rung of American society, doing the jobs that no one wants to do, being discriminated against in public services, and being used as a pawn by politicians who want to scare people with the image of being overrun by the "other". Perhaps the most egregious case of this phenomenon happened to the Japanese in America during World War II. It is this immigrant experience that Julie Otsuka chronicles in her book The Buddha in the Attic.
Otsuka's book is written in the third person plural, from the perspective of women who were brought to the United States from Japan after World War I as wives to Japanese men they had never met. This rather interesting literary device is used to highlight the similarities of the immigrant experience for these women, even as it describes the variety of experiences that defined them as farm laborers, shop clerks, maids, and laundry workers. This very short novel, spare in its language, presents a portrait of women who try to find some way to survive in a world that has turned upside down, taking them away from everything they know to a world where not even the man they are going to marry is familiar. Through back-breaking, heartbreaking work, they bring children into the world, and watch them become more American than Japanese. Despite their fear that their children are moving away from them, they are hopeful that their futures will be better-until World War II brings it all crashing down around them again.
Like Otsuka's first book, When the Emperor Was Divine, The Buddha in the Attic is filled with carefully chosen words, meant to evoke specific ideas and feelings without extraneous language. While occasionally the long, collective paragraphs start to feel a bit listy, the book works because the snippets of women's stories that are elaborated upon are compelling enough to provide a frame for the rest. By the end I felt overwhelmed by the struggles of these women-and once more furious and regretful that it is my country, whose ideals I revere, that interned so many of our own citizens out of racial fear and prejudice.
Nothing speaks as well to the way that communities changed after internment as the last portion of the book. Suddenly, instead of the voices of the women, the narrator changes to a collective white American voice. That voice describes how ignorant and/or arrogant white society was during World War II, when any injustice could be justified if it was for "national security" purposes (Sound familiar? Patriot Act, anyone?). What was startling was not just that people seemed to approve of their improper jailing of their neighbors, but that any negative reaction to it came from a selfish concern about who would pick their crops/clean their shirts/scrub their toilets. As a reader, I couldn't help but wonder what happened to the women who's lives I had been invited into, and perhaps that's the most startling thing-that an entire group of people can just be disappeared while the rest of us go about our lives.
My own family immigration history is fairly recent. My paternal grandparents came to America in the early 20th century from Quebec. They settled in New England, in an area where there was already a community for them to join. While my great-grandparents spoke Quebecois French almost exclusively, it did not take long for my grandmother and grandfather to learn English and assimilate into mainstream American culture. My grandfather fought in World War II, and was proud to serve the nation he saw as his, even though he had only been in the US for half of his rather short life at that point.

Otsuka's book is written in the third person plural, from the perspective of women who were brought to the United States from Japan after World War I as wives to Japanese men they had never met. This rather interesting literary device is used to highlight the similarities of the immigrant experience for these women, even as it describes the variety of experiences that defined them as farm laborers, shop clerks, maids, and laundry workers. This very short novel, spare in its language, presents a portrait of women who try to find some way to survive in a world that has turned upside down, taking them away from everything they know to a world where not even the man they are going to marry is familiar. Through back-breaking, heartbreaking work, they bring children into the world, and watch them become more American than Japanese. Despite their fear that their children are moving away from them, they are hopeful that their futures will be better-until World War II brings it all crashing down around them again.
Like Otsuka's first book, When the Emperor Was Divine, The Buddha in the Attic is filled with carefully chosen words, meant to evoke specific ideas and feelings without extraneous language. While occasionally the long, collective paragraphs start to feel a bit listy, the book works because the snippets of women's stories that are elaborated upon are compelling enough to provide a frame for the rest. By the end I felt overwhelmed by the struggles of these women-and once more furious and regretful that it is my country, whose ideals I revere, that interned so many of our own citizens out of racial fear and prejudice.
Nothing speaks as well to the way that communities changed after internment as the last portion of the book. Suddenly, instead of the voices of the women, the narrator changes to a collective white American voice. That voice describes how ignorant and/or arrogant white society was during World War II, when any injustice could be justified if it was for "national security" purposes (Sound familiar? Patriot Act, anyone?). What was startling was not just that people seemed to approve of their improper jailing of their neighbors, but that any negative reaction to it came from a selfish concern about who would pick their crops/clean their shirts/scrub their toilets. As a reader, I couldn't help but wonder what happened to the women who's lives I had been invited into, and perhaps that's the most startling thing-that an entire group of people can just be disappeared while the rest of us go about our lives.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I have always thought that the phrase "women's fiction" was somehow a slight (or not so slight) put down of the kind of stories that women find enjoyable or meaningful. While it is certainly not a universal fact that all women like to read stories about family, relationships, and friendships, it is certainly true that much of the fiction marketed to women as women's fiction is just that. I have mixed feelings about the type of novel that is labeled "women's fiction". Like any other genre, some is better written and more literary than others. On the spectrum from serious literature to fluff, I find myself most comfortable on the more literary end. The titles on the fluff end tend to feel a bit too much like a Lifetime Movie to me-trite, easy platitudes or oversimplified stories about complex issues of domestic violence, sexual assault, or family dynamics.
Sadly, my book club's November pick, Macomber's book Between Friends, falls a little too far to the fluff end for me. The epistolary novel is tells the story of two women, wealthy Jillian and her poor friend Lesley, who become friends as children and maintain that friendship throughout the trials and tribulations of their lives. While I don't have a problem with an epistolary novel in theory, in practice I find they often do more "telling" than "showing". Telling a story through a series of letters and other documents relieves the author of the need to actually develop characters, evoke feeling through setting or events, or write intelligent, meaningful dialogue. This book felt like a novel written in hearsay-there is little immediacy to the events, which I think takes away from any emotional impact.
I was also disturbed by how stereotypical the characters lives were. Lesley, the daughter of an abusive alcoholic, goes on to marry an abusive alcoholic after he gets her pregnant. Because she is a devout Catholic, she stays with him "for the children", and refuses to use birth control, ending up with three more children before she finally decides enough is enough. Jillian, the daughter of privilege, rebels in high school by falling in love with the gas jockey with a heart of gold-who just happens to get killed in Viet Nam, clearing the way for her to go on to the pricey private school and career as a lawyer that she was destined to have from the start. I can't cite too many other examples, mostly because I couldn't finish reading the book, but suffice it to say that I was unimpressed. One of the women in my book club reminded me that in the 1950s and 60s there were some women exactly like Lesley and Jillian. My response to her was, "I can acknowledge that without wanting to read a hole book about it."
My best friend has one other major complaint, which I share. Somehow these two women from Washington state, one of whom has only a high school education and rarely leaves her hometown, are connected to every major event in American life for 50 years. My friend called it "Forest Gump" syndrome, after that charming movie about mildly retarded Forest and his many brushes with greatness. Difference is, on screen it worked. In this book it just seems contrived. All in all, I'm pretty sure I will not be reading a Debbie Macomber book again any time soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)