Wilson Chaney, a Harvard professor, comes to Carlotta Carlyle for help finding a blackmailer. Turns out that he had an affair with a student, who has since died in a fire. He wants Carlotta to retrieve some letters that he wrote to her and protect his marriage and his reputation. But as Carlotta starts tracking the victim, the last few weeks of the girl's life, and the probable blackmailer, she discovers there is much more at stake than one Harvard professor's reputation. Wilson Chaney is working on a new drug for treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, one that shows the promise of help for millions of kids-and for lots of profits to whoever gets it to market first.
Barnes' character Carlotta Carlyle is one of my favorite female PIs. Carlotta-private investigator, sometime cabby, and life-long Boston resident, shows a resiliency and independence that is common in the best written female lead characters. With a new love interest in FBI agent Leon, her quirky roommate Roz, and her little "sister" Paolina, Carlotta has her hands full even without a troublesome client and someone trying to kill her. Add former love interest and mob boss Sam Gianelli, and there is enough personal and professional intrigue going on to keep the reader interested for all 320 pages. While the mystery itself is not as intricate as some (I did figure it out by about half-way thorough the book), it is an enjoyable popcorn book.
Deep Pockets, Linda Barnes
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Saturday, January 14, 2012
...if The Paris Wife is an accurate historical portrayal of his early literary life, then I feel like I can forgive some of his macho, sexist writing.
In case you lived under a literary rock for the last 12 months, The Paris Wife is the fictionalized story of Hadley Hemingway ne Richardson, who was Ernest Hemingway's first wife (out of four total). Based on extensive research into the Hemingways' time in Paris, the novel starts in Chicago, where a young Hadley meets an even younger Ernest at a party. Instantly drawn to each other, the two start an affair that eventually leads to marriage. Despite the disapproval of both families, Ernest and Hadley set off for Paris, the happening scene for writers and artists in the very early 20th century. Surrounded by such literary giants and Ezra Pound, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Gertrude Stein, Ernest sets about the serious business of writing. Hadley, left to her own devices most of the time, loses herself in his career. Over time, their relationship cannot withstand the darkness in his own soul, or his affair with a young editor at Vogue.
I've managed to read one and a half Hemingway novels, and a few of his short stories. The one I remember best is Hills Like White Elephants, about a woman who wants to have a baby with her husband but he wants her to have an abortion so he doesn't have to change his rather selfish lifestyle. Not exactly endearing. I've always been put off by his very violent ideas about manhood, and his rather apparent disrespect for women. Having read The Paris Wife, however, I am better able to put his ideas in not just a historical context, but a more personal, emotional one.
What I didn't know about him before reading this book was that he was injured in the first World War, and that he spent most of the rest of his life trying to stare down death, terrified by his own morality. Constantly afraid of being seen as cowardly or weak, he actively sought out experiences, like the bullfights in Pamplona, to convince himself of his own strength. His war experiences, coupled with his depressive nature and the history of mental illness in his family, suddenly I see his overly-macho definition of what it means to be a man in a new light. And while I still don't like his fiction, and I still think that he was a philandering sexist, at least now I have a context to put it in. I now have compassion where before was only contempt.
In case you lived under a literary rock for the last 12 months, The Paris Wife is the fictionalized story of Hadley Hemingway ne Richardson, who was Ernest Hemingway's first wife (out of four total). Based on extensive research into the Hemingways' time in Paris, the novel starts in Chicago, where a young Hadley meets an even younger Ernest at a party. Instantly drawn to each other, the two start an affair that eventually leads to marriage. Despite the disapproval of both families, Ernest and Hadley set off for Paris, the happening scene for writers and artists in the very early 20th century. Surrounded by such literary giants and Ezra Pound, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Gertrude Stein, Ernest sets about the serious business of writing. Hadley, left to her own devices most of the time, loses herself in his career. Over time, their relationship cannot withstand the darkness in his own soul, or his affair with a young editor at Vogue.
I've managed to read one and a half Hemingway novels, and a few of his short stories. The one I remember best is Hills Like White Elephants, about a woman who wants to have a baby with her husband but he wants her to have an abortion so he doesn't have to change his rather selfish lifestyle. Not exactly endearing. I've always been put off by his very violent ideas about manhood, and his rather apparent disrespect for women. Having read The Paris Wife, however, I am better able to put his ideas in not just a historical context, but a more personal, emotional one.
What I didn't know about him before reading this book was that he was injured in the first World War, and that he spent most of the rest of his life trying to stare down death, terrified by his own morality. Constantly afraid of being seen as cowardly or weak, he actively sought out experiences, like the bullfights in Pamplona, to convince himself of his own strength. His war experiences, coupled with his depressive nature and the history of mental illness in his family, suddenly I see his overly-macho definition of what it means to be a man in a new light. And while I still don't like his fiction, and I still think that he was a philandering sexist, at least now I have a context to put it in. I now have compassion where before was only contempt.
Sunday, January 08, 2012
Lisa Gardner writes psychological thrillers that show some of the darkest places that the human mind can go. Most of her novels, whether stand alone or part of her D.D. Warren series, explore the complicated relationships we often have with our parents, spouses, or children. Live to Tell is no exception. In this fast paced, fairly creepy thriller, D.D. Warren and her team are called in to investigate the apparent murder/suicide of a family of five. However, there are things about the scene that don't add up, and it soon becomes apparent that what was staged to look like a family annihilation was in fact the cold-blooded murder of a happy couple and their children. When another family is killed in a similar way, D.D. knows that they are looking for someone truly disturbed, who appears to be reenacting a family annihilation from the past. Tying all of the victims together is a child psych unit for the most acute cases-children who have psychoses so severe that they are a real danger to themselves and their families. Danielle Burton, one of the psychiatric nurses, was the lone survivor of a family annihilation herself, and soon D. D. come to believe that she may be the key to solving the whole case.
A word to the wise-this book is not for the faint of heart. The description of he troubled children and the things they are capable of was chilling. As horrific as the crimes themselves were, reading about a little boy who is so cunning and violent that he lies in wait for his mother in order to follow through on his threat to kill her was worse. But the setting of the locked children's psych ward was fascinating, and the mystery itself had enough twists and turns that there is more than the slightly creepy draw of the psychotic children. This popcorn comes with a side of crazy, but it is an enjoyable ride nonetheless.
A word to the wise-this book is not for the faint of heart. The description of he troubled children and the things they are capable of was chilling. As horrific as the crimes themselves were, reading about a little boy who is so cunning and violent that he lies in wait for his mother in order to follow through on his threat to kill her was worse. But the setting of the locked children's psych ward was fascinating, and the mystery itself had enough twists and turns that there is more than the slightly creepy draw of the psychotic children. This popcorn comes with a side of crazy, but it is an enjoyable ride nonetheless.
Sunday, January 01, 2012
Take a soldier's dying wish, an independent battlefield nurse, a decades old secret, and a madman in an asylum, put them together into a deliciously engaging story, and you have A Duty to the Dead by Charles Todd.
I loved the character of Bess. She was independent and strong-willed, traits I especially like in my heroines. But what really made the book for me was the very British-ness of is all. You've got the references to serving in India that always remind me of The Secret Garden, family estates, the whole upstairs/downstairs vibe, the country rectory, and the whole asylum thing. Plus lots and lots of tea. Todd brought a Victorian sensibility to the Edwardian era-change the war they are fighting and the reference to motor-cars and this book could have taken place 50 years earlier.
One of the things that drew me into the novel was the examination of the family dynamics that led to the tragic events that unfold. So much of British upper class life was kept under wraps out of propriety's sake that figuring out exactly what is going on in any given family is a bit like opening one of those gifts within a gift-you know, where someone wraps a small box inside a larger box and so on-except usually what is discovered when you get to the final layer of these family dramas is not nearly as nice as a present.
This is the first of a new series by Todd with Bess as the main character, and I look forward to following her on many more mysteries.
Here's what Goodreads has to say about the plot:
England, 1916. Independent-minded Bess Crawford's upbringing is far different from that of the usual upper-middle-class British gentlewoman. Growing up in India, she learned the importance of responsibility, honor, and duty from her officer father. At the outbreak of World War I, she followed in his footsteps and volunteered for the nursing corps, serving from the battlefields of France to the doomed hospital ship Britannic.
On one voyage, Bess grows fond of the young, gravely wounded Lieutenant Arthur Graham. Something rests heavily on his conscience, and to give him a little peace as he dies, she promises to deliver a message to his brother. It is some months before she can carry out this duty, and when she's next in England, she herself is recovering from a wound.
When Bess arrives at the Graham house in Kent, Jonathan Graham listens to his brother's last wishes with surprising indifference. Neither his mother nor his brother Timothy seems to think it has any significance. Unsettled by this, Bess is about to take her leave when sudden tragedy envelops her. She quickly discovers that fulfilling this duty to the dead has thrust her into a maelstrom of intrigue and murder that will endanger her own life and test her courage as not even war has.
I loved the character of Bess. She was independent and strong-willed, traits I especially like in my heroines. But what really made the book for me was the very British-ness of is all. You've got the references to serving in India that always remind me of The Secret Garden, family estates, the whole upstairs/downstairs vibe, the country rectory, and the whole asylum thing. Plus lots and lots of tea. Todd brought a Victorian sensibility to the Edwardian era-change the war they are fighting and the reference to motor-cars and this book could have taken place 50 years earlier.
One of the things that drew me into the novel was the examination of the family dynamics that led to the tragic events that unfold. So much of British upper class life was kept under wraps out of propriety's sake that figuring out exactly what is going on in any given family is a bit like opening one of those gifts within a gift-you know, where someone wraps a small box inside a larger box and so on-except usually what is discovered when you get to the final layer of these family dramas is not nearly as nice as a present.
This is the first of a new series by Todd with Bess as the main character, and I look forward to following her on many more mysteries.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Summary, from Goodreads-
Dismas Hardy and the rest of the cast of characters from Lescroart's books are some of my favorites. Lescroart does a decent job of making them into real people, and I care about what happens to them. The mystery itself is fairly compelling, and there is enough misdirection to make it unlikely you'll figure out whodunnit early enough to ruin the rest of the book. There was a bit more deus ex machina in this one than I usually care for-from the accident that took homicide detective Abe Glitsy's eye off the ball, to the last minute detail that reveals the true killer, it was a little less Hardy being brilliant (though he was) and a little more luck of the draw, but enjoyable nonetheless. A good popcorn read, especially if you are following the series. If you've never read Lescroart before, go back and start at the beginning of the Dismas Hardy series-you won't be disappointed!
The first victim is Dylan Vogler, a charming ex-convict who manages the Bay Beans West coffee shop in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury district. When his body is found, inspectors discover that his knapsack is filled with high-grade marijuana. It soon becomes clear that San Francisco's A-list flocked to Bay Beans West not only for their caffeine fix.
But how much did Maya Townshend-the beautiful socialite niece of the city's mayor, and the absentee owner of the shop-know about what was going on inside her business? And how intimate had she really been with Dylan, her old college friend?
As another of Maya's acquaintances falls victim to murder, and as the names of the dead men's celebrity, political, and even law- enforcement customers come to light, tabloid-fueled controversy takes the investigation into the realms of conspiracy and cover-up. Prosecutors close in on Maya, who has a deep secret of her own-a secret she needs to protect at all costs during her very public trial, where not only her future but the entire political landscape of San Francisco hangs in the balance, hostage to an explosive secret that Dismas Hardy is privilege-bound to protect.
Dismas Hardy and the rest of the cast of characters from Lescroart's books are some of my favorites. Lescroart does a decent job of making them into real people, and I care about what happens to them. The mystery itself is fairly compelling, and there is enough misdirection to make it unlikely you'll figure out whodunnit early enough to ruin the rest of the book. There was a bit more deus ex machina in this one than I usually care for-from the accident that took homicide detective Abe Glitsy's eye off the ball, to the last minute detail that reveals the true killer, it was a little less Hardy being brilliant (though he was) and a little more luck of the draw, but enjoyable nonetheless. A good popcorn read, especially if you are following the series. If you've never read Lescroart before, go back and start at the beginning of the Dismas Hardy series-you won't be disappointed!
Saturday, December 24, 2011
For many years I prided myself on the fact that I never gave up on a book. Even if a book was not really doin' it for me, I stuck with it, sure that the author was trying to convey something that I just needed to work a little harder to pick up on. After all, they took the time and care to write the darn thing-I should at least put in the time and effort to finish it.
Then one day (perhaps struck by a growing sense of my own mortality) I decided that there are too many good books in the world to waste my precious reading time on bad ones, and I've put down many a snoozer since. But not my favorite authors. Surely if I have loved everything a person has ever written, then if I just keep slogging through one of their books I will find that moment of joy in the written word. Surely my favorite authors would not let me down?
Laura Lippman, I am sad to say, you've let me down.
Life Sentences is the story of Cassandra Fallows, an author who became successful writing about her father's infidelities and their affect on her. After writing a less-than-stellar novel, she goes home to Baltimore to mine her childhood friendships for another memoir, something that will take her back to her bestseller status. The irony is that in writing about an author who is afraid she's lost her mojo, Lippman has written a novel that shows that perhaps her mojo took a bit of a vacation.
The impetus for Cassandra's return to her childhood home is the story of an old schoolmate of hers who went to jail for seven years rather than reveal what happened to her infant, who disappeared and was never found. In revisiting her childhood friendships, Cassandra discovers just how fallible memory can be. Her old friends are upset with her portrayal of them in print, and they refuse to help her find their old classmate. Lots of intrigue ensues, revealing a conspiracy that involves politicians, blackmail, and twenty years of secrets.
To which I say "yawn". Lippman usually pairs really good character development with intriguing plots to create suspense novels that are not formulaic, but little windows into human behavior. Her novels usually carry some kind of emotional punch, but I found myself not really caring what happened to any of the characters, including the narrator. I made myself stick with it, partly for the reason above and partly because the mystery was (just) engaging enough to make me want to know how it resolved, but even the ending was a disappointment-more whimper than wow. Since this Lippman book is a stand-alone, I'd say skip it. Her Tess Monaghan books and other stand-alones are a much better use of your reading time!
Thursday, December 22, 2011
The experience of immigrant groups in the United States is something that has interested me ever since I took a multicultural education class a few years ago. I read some really moving testimonials from people of various immigrant groups (beginning with Italians and the Irish and moving on through Chinese, Japanese, and Mexican) describing their experiences (or the family stories passed down by their grandparents) and how their families never gave up on making it in America.
My own family immigration history is fairly recent. My paternal grandparents came to America in the early 20th century from Quebec. They settled in New England, in an area where there was already a community for them to join. While my great-grandparents spoke Quebecois French almost exclusively, it did not take long for my grandmother and grandfather to learn English and assimilate into mainstream American culture. My grandfather fought in World War II, and was proud to serve the nation he saw as his, even though he had only been in the US for half of his rather short life at that point.
We as a society have never been particularly welcoming to new arrivals, regardless of where they are from or what the words on the Statue of Liberty may imply about how inclusive we pretend we are. The myth propagated is that as long as immigrants are willing to work-hard and respect American values we will accept them with open arms. The reality is that every immigrant group has started out on the lowest rung of American society, doing the jobs that no one wants to do, being discriminated against in public services, and being used as a pawn by politicians who want to scare people with the image of being overrun by the "other". Perhaps the most egregious case of this phenomenon happened to the Japanese in America during World War II. It is this immigrant experience that Julie Otsuka chronicles in her book The Buddha in the Attic.
Otsuka's book is written in the third person plural, from the perspective of women who were brought to the United States from Japan after World War I as wives to Japanese men they had never met. This rather interesting literary device is used to highlight the similarities of the immigrant experience for these women, even as it describes the variety of experiences that defined them as farm laborers, shop clerks, maids, and laundry workers. This very short novel, spare in its language, presents a portrait of women who try to find some way to survive in a world that has turned upside down, taking them away from everything they know to a world where not even the man they are going to marry is familiar. Through back-breaking, heartbreaking work, they bring children into the world, and watch them become more American than Japanese. Despite their fear that their children are moving away from them, they are hopeful that their futures will be better-until World War II brings it all crashing down around them again.
Like Otsuka's first book, When the Emperor Was Divine, The Buddha in the Attic is filled with carefully chosen words, meant to evoke specific ideas and feelings without extraneous language. While occasionally the long, collective paragraphs start to feel a bit listy, the book works because the snippets of women's stories that are elaborated upon are compelling enough to provide a frame for the rest. By the end I felt overwhelmed by the struggles of these women-and once more furious and regretful that it is my country, whose ideals I revere, that interned so many of our own citizens out of racial fear and prejudice.
Nothing speaks as well to the way that communities changed after internment as the last portion of the book. Suddenly, instead of the voices of the women, the narrator changes to a collective white American voice. That voice describes how ignorant and/or arrogant white society was during World War II, when any injustice could be justified if it was for "national security" purposes (Sound familiar? Patriot Act, anyone?). What was startling was not just that people seemed to approve of their improper jailing of their neighbors, but that any negative reaction to it came from a selfish concern about who would pick their crops/clean their shirts/scrub their toilets. As a reader, I couldn't help but wonder what happened to the women who's lives I had been invited into, and perhaps that's the most startling thing-that an entire group of people can just be disappeared while the rest of us go about our lives.
My own family immigration history is fairly recent. My paternal grandparents came to America in the early 20th century from Quebec. They settled in New England, in an area where there was already a community for them to join. While my great-grandparents spoke Quebecois French almost exclusively, it did not take long for my grandmother and grandfather to learn English and assimilate into mainstream American culture. My grandfather fought in World War II, and was proud to serve the nation he saw as his, even though he had only been in the US for half of his rather short life at that point.
We as a society have never been particularly welcoming to new arrivals, regardless of where they are from or what the words on the Statue of Liberty may imply about how inclusive we pretend we are. The myth propagated is that as long as immigrants are willing to work-hard and respect American values we will accept them with open arms. The reality is that every immigrant group has started out on the lowest rung of American society, doing the jobs that no one wants to do, being discriminated against in public services, and being used as a pawn by politicians who want to scare people with the image of being overrun by the "other". Perhaps the most egregious case of this phenomenon happened to the Japanese in America during World War II. It is this immigrant experience that Julie Otsuka chronicles in her book The Buddha in the Attic.Otsuka's book is written in the third person plural, from the perspective of women who were brought to the United States from Japan after World War I as wives to Japanese men they had never met. This rather interesting literary device is used to highlight the similarities of the immigrant experience for these women, even as it describes the variety of experiences that defined them as farm laborers, shop clerks, maids, and laundry workers. This very short novel, spare in its language, presents a portrait of women who try to find some way to survive in a world that has turned upside down, taking them away from everything they know to a world where not even the man they are going to marry is familiar. Through back-breaking, heartbreaking work, they bring children into the world, and watch them become more American than Japanese. Despite their fear that their children are moving away from them, they are hopeful that their futures will be better-until World War II brings it all crashing down around them again.
Like Otsuka's first book, When the Emperor Was Divine, The Buddha in the Attic is filled with carefully chosen words, meant to evoke specific ideas and feelings without extraneous language. While occasionally the long, collective paragraphs start to feel a bit listy, the book works because the snippets of women's stories that are elaborated upon are compelling enough to provide a frame for the rest. By the end I felt overwhelmed by the struggles of these women-and once more furious and regretful that it is my country, whose ideals I revere, that interned so many of our own citizens out of racial fear and prejudice.
Nothing speaks as well to the way that communities changed after internment as the last portion of the book. Suddenly, instead of the voices of the women, the narrator changes to a collective white American voice. That voice describes how ignorant and/or arrogant white society was during World War II, when any injustice could be justified if it was for "national security" purposes (Sound familiar? Patriot Act, anyone?). What was startling was not just that people seemed to approve of their improper jailing of their neighbors, but that any negative reaction to it came from a selfish concern about who would pick their crops/clean their shirts/scrub their toilets. As a reader, I couldn't help but wonder what happened to the women who's lives I had been invited into, and perhaps that's the most startling thing-that an entire group of people can just be disappeared while the rest of us go about our lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


























